Orange County NC Website
~a~ <br />use, and had local identity. It is therefore ironic to us that the concept of "community <br />character" is sometimes wielded to perpetuate homogenous, low-density, suburban <br />development patterns that isolate neighbors and fragment our rural lands. Such developments <br />do not adequately preserve habitats or viewsheds, and they add significantly to per-capita <br />resource consumption and pollution generation. To be consistent with historical precedent, <br />Orange County should allow more intense development at rural crossroads. Ideally, our <br />economic development efforts would produce local businesses such as markets that generate <br />local income, sales taxes, and jobs and also reduce transportation emissions. The most <br />important historical characteristic to observe in such areas is the HUMAN SCALE. Green <br />building and a diversity of uses may call for additional flexibility and community involvement <br />in how we conceive of appropriate design. The Village Project offers its assistance to the <br />County in this regard. The County may ultimately wish to follow other innovative <br />communities in adopting form-based codes and having designers participate in the <br />development review process. <br />7) Requiring Energy-Efficient, High-Performance Buildings. The Comprehensive Plan <br />must ensure that new construction and renovations result in energy-efficient, high-performance <br />buildings. Abundant resources are available that would provide starting points and guidance <br />for the County in this effort. Orange County should lead the state, as it has in the past with <br />other critical environmental issues, in modeling codes and ordinances that will reduce the <br />impacts of new growth and per-capita. resource needs when it is most efficient to do so: at the <br />time of construction or rehabilitation. The housing, commercial, industrial, and institutional <br />development envisioned by the Plan will be around long into the future. Let's make it worth <br />keeping and maintaining. <br />On a procedural note, we encourage the Board of Commissioners to ask each Element-lead <br />advisory board to submit comments by July 9 to the Planning Board for their consideration as <br />they continue to refine the Comprehensive Plan this summer. <br />Regarding stakeholder participation generally, we also request that the County advise the <br />people and organizations who have generously volunteered their time to understand the Plan <br />and the planning process how their comments have been and will be taken into account in the <br />final drafts of the Comprehensive Plan and subsequent implementation planning phases. <br />In conclusion, we return to the topic of sustainability. One final comment on the Plan <br />illustrates a tension we have long noted in the County and would like to see resolved through <br />the Comprehensive Plan: <br />The term "carrying capacity" is a use ful concept in population ecology, but in a planning <br />document at the County scale, "c arrying capacity" is a dubious and misleading notion. In <br />order to analyze "carryi ng capacity; 'the analyst must define the boundaries of the system. For <br />animals, this involves looking at foraging, habitat, migration patterns, etc. <br />The Village Project • PO Box 685 • Carrboro NC 27510 • 919-942-6114 • w~vw.thevillageproject.com 3 <br />