Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-25-2008- c2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 08-25-2008
>
Agenda - 08-25-2008- c2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2008 3:30:05 PM
Creation date
9/10/2008 3:29:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/25/2008
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
c2
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080825
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 of 4 <br />III <br />account for its longer term and wider impacts ("externalities"), such "business as usual" is nova <br />sustainable path. Orange County can do much better for its citizens and the environment. The <br />Comprehensive Plan should seek and embrace economic activities and patterns that promote <br />sustainability both locally and globally. Such an economy would be substantially locally owned, and <br />would export as much as it imports or more. Implementation of the Comprehensive Plan should bring <br />about a "local living economy" that uses sustainable practices to produce knowledge, goods and <br />services, and offers predominantly high-quality employment opportunities. This vision includes -and <br />will resemble -the County's laudable support of our local agricultural systems. <br />3) Investing in Public Infrastructure. Public infrastructure, particularly water and wastewater <br />services, is necessary for the compact, mixed-use, economically vibrant, and transit-supportive <br />communities that, in our considered judgment, are the best form of development for Orange County. <br />The Comprehensive Plan should explicitly state the County's intent to immediately begin to provide the <br />infrastructure and management mechanisms to enable compact and sustainable land use patterns (a.k.a. <br />"smart growth.") and to ensure that areas identified as suitable for growth (such as Transfer of <br />Development Rights (TDR) "receiving areas") are developed sustainably. <br />4) Zoning for Mixed-Used Districts. Compact mixed-use developments will require new zoning <br />designations; currently, there are no true mixed-use zoning districts in the County. Within these zones a <br />minimum residential density of 8 to 1 S dwelling units per acre is necessary to support bus service; 20 to <br />30 units to the acre are needed to support rail transit. The new zoning districts must effectively <br />"upzone" areas most suitably located for intensive development and should enable uses that are mixed <br />vertically as well as horizontally. Ideally, such zoning changes will be undertaken as pazt of a larger <br />TDR program, so that upzoning and downzoning do not create inequities among affected landowners. <br />These new zones must be available for application in areas where the County decides to provide new <br />infrastructure to enable compact development to take place. <br />5) Inclusionary Zoning in Mixed-Use Districts. The goal of increased housing opportunities for our <br />workforce, for lower-income residents, and for special needs households should be addressed by an <br />objective to implement inclusionary zoning requirements in growth areas with three criteria: price (rent <br />or purchase cost), square footage, and number of bedrooms. Limiting size and requiring minimum <br />densities in growth areas encourages multi-family structures that use. land, water, and energy faz more <br />efficiently than single-family detached dwelling units. Moreover, such patterns are an important and <br />increasingly demanded form of human settlement because they provide the social benefits of living <br />among a diverse population and increased amenities due to .economies of scale. <br />6) Adaptability as a Key Component of "Community Character." Historically, human settlements <br />evolved at crossroads and other transportation nodes. They were compact, mixed-use, and had local <br />identity. It is therefore ironic to us that the concept of "community character" is sometimes wielded to <br />perpetuate homogenous, low-density, suburban development patterns that isolate neighbors and <br />fragment our rural lands. Such developments do not adequately preserve habitats or viewsheds, and <br />they add significantly to per-capita resource consumption and pollution generation. To be consistent <br />with historical precedent, Orange County should allow more intense development at rural crossroads. <br />Ideally, our economic development efforts would produce local businesses such as mazkets that generate <br />local income, sales taxes, and jobs and also reduce transportation emissions. The most important <br />historical characteristic to observe in such areas is the HUMAN SCALE. Green building and a diversity <br />of uses may call for additional flexibility and community involvement in how we conceive of <br />appropriate design. The Village Project offers its assistance to the County in this regazd. The County <br />may ultimately wish to follow other innovative communities in adopting form-based codes and having <br />designers participate in the development review process. <br />6/6/2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.