Agenda - 08-25-2008 - c1 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

CIS Open Space Conventional Plan The approximately 40% open space is located mainly along an existing stream, around the perimeter and in the middle of the subdivision. There is a cross connection between the two main areas for a potential trail. One area of deficiency is along the eastern side of the property. Among the various comments at the Neighborhood Information Meeting was requiring the provision of a small buffer along the backs of lots 5, 6, and 7 to lessen the potential for encroachments on neighboring property to the south. The open space for this lot layout is preferable to the flexible development plan. There is a balance of perimeter open space and centrally located open space which improves livability for residents. Flexible Plan Approximately 37.7% of the total acreage on the Conservation Cluster Flexible Plan would be in Open Space. Virtually all of the open space is at the perimeter of the subdivision with little centrally located open space. All of the development is confined to the central part of the subdivision diminishing the `neighborhood feel' of the development. The location of the open space is forced to the perimeter and there is little room left for development and centrally located open space. Environmental Assessment The State Clearinghouse has returned all comments from State agencies, which are included in the packet materials. There are no issues that would require an Environmental Impact Statement to be prepared. Also, Orange County staff did not find any detrimental environmental impacts associated with this development. Should no issues arise at the Public Hearing to indicate otherwise, staff will complete a Finding of No Significant Impact memo and reference it in the Findings of Fact prior to a decision of the Board of County Commissioners. Biological Inventory The submitted Biological Inventory (attached) indicates there are no substantial negative environmental impacts associated with this development. Parks and Recreation /ERCD The Parks and Recreation Advisory Council (PRAC) has reviewed this proposal and recommended the payment-in-lieu option rather than any public dedication [see attached agency review comment]. Staff recommends that the payment-in-lieu option be accepted for these lots [$422 x 45 = $18,990]. PRAC and ERCD also recommended that a trail connection to the Efland Cheeks Elementary trail and Richmond Hills trail be required. Staff has included both recommendations into the recommended SUP conditions of approval. Approximately 14,200 square feet of private recreation space will need to be provided. This area has not been designated at this time, but will most likely take the form of trail connections and possibly sidewalks. Sheriff The Sheriff s office has not yet responded to service issues regarding this proposal.