Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-19-2008- 6d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 08-19-2008
>
Agenda - 08-19-2008- 6d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2008 2:15:30 PM
Creation date
9/10/2008 2:15:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/19/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6d
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080819
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br />i Chair Jacobs said that the topic of Orange/Chatham regional planning was raised at the <br />2 last AOG meeting and what was discussed at the joint meetings, and it was promised that a <br />3 more full report would be brought bads at the next AOG meeting. Staff will make initial <br />4 pn~entations and then the elected offidals present at the joint meetings could speak on these <br />s items, if they wish. <br />6 Planning Director Craig Benedict said that, based on some previous meetings, staffs <br />7 were asked to meet and discuss regional planning with Hillsborough, Chapel Hill, Carrboro, <br />s UNC, OWASA, Chatham County, and Pittsboro. During the d'~sc;ussions, it was realized that in <br />9 this regional perspective inductee such entfies as the City of Durham, Dufiam County, and <br />io Cary. The areas of intent indude land use planning, transportation, parks, open space, <br />11 environmerrt, and GIS information and mapping. Some of the areas of joint interest indude <br />12 Jordan Lake Watershed, Haw River Watershed, 15-501 Transportation Corridor, development <br />13 of regional impact:, and the regional value-added shafed-use food and agricultural processing <br />14 center. There was discussion about how best to share this information among staffs, elected <br />is offidals, etc., as new information becomes available. He made reference to Attachment 1-a. <br />16 Chair Jacobs said that the three main topics were regional watershed protection issues, <br />t7 transportation planning and public transportation issues, and joint planning. He said that part of <br />18 that discussion will indude joint use of Jonian Lake water supply. There were also discussions <br />19 about trying to get a compilation of the similarities and differences between the comments made <br />20 on the Jordan Lake rules proposed. <br />21 George Luder said that the group talked about selecting spedfic projects rather than <br />22 going too global in terms of the joint planning exercise. These could indude the Haw River <br />23 Watershed, Jordan Lake Watershed, 15-501 corridor, and planning for local parks - Southern <br />24 Park would be an example. <br />25 Chair Jacobs said that there was discussion about the interest of working together on <br />26 some of these issues, and Chatham's Board was interested in the same things as Chapel Hill <br />27 and Orange County, and this has not been the case in the past. Some of the discussions <br />28 irnolved Carolyn Elfland from UNC, and public transportation was a major topic. <br />29 George Lucier said that there are 12,000 houses that have been approved but not yet <br />3o built in Chatham County, and many of them would use the 15-501 corridor. <br />31 Jim Warn asked if there was interest in talking about a possible bypass around Chapel <br />32 Hill coming from the south. He said that 15-501 is already a parking lot at times and there <br />33 needs to be relief, and public transit cannot take all of these trips. <br />34 George Lucier said that there is not enough financial capital, and this would have to get <br />35 on the Transportation Improvement Plan with DOT. He said that DOT is deeply over committed <br />36 and it is starting to delay projects. <br />37 Jim Ward said to try and at least get it on the DOTs agenda. <br />3s Commissioner Gordon said that she attended the meeting of the Durham-Chapel Hill- <br />39 Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organ'¢ation, and in the next two meetings, the results of the <br />4o transportation study will be available,, which will addn~s some of this area. She said that it <br />41 would be timely to bring up the issue of a bypass when this study comes out. <br />42 George Lucier said to bring it up at the next meeting of this group and Commissioner <br />43 Gordon said that it would probably be in May. <br />44 Bill Strom asked about an interlocal agreemenrt. Craig Benedict said that in 1989 there <br />45 was a proposed courtesy review agreement and he said with the boards' approvals, they could <br />46 implement something like this and he said they could work towards a joint planning agreement <br />47 Bill Strom said that there should really be a joint planning agreement discussion on the <br />48 table because there are joint interests. <br />49 George Lucier suggested working towards a Memorandum of Understanding, or several <br />5o MOAs. There could be one overarching agreement that would identify specfic areas and then <br />51 have subheadings. <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.