Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-19-2008 - 4a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 08-19-2008
>
Agenda - 08-19-2008 - 4a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2013 10:21:54 AM
Creation date
9/10/2008 11:19:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/19/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
4a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080819
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />12 T <br />Program continues to add property to the County, and as parks are developed, she recognized <br />that parks are becoming a greater portion of what this department can focus on. The staff <br />cannot spread themselves too thin and she wants to focus on things that provide to the entire <br />County. There are other summer camps and after - school programs in the County. The goal <br />was to not duplicate what is already available, but to focus on more of what the County direction <br />has been. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that when the decision was made, it was in the rush of the <br />budget process, and if there was ever a vote to discontinue, it was in an overall vote to approve <br />the budget. She thinks that it is good that everyone has now heard the rationale. <br />Commissioner Foushee said that, given that the Board has approval from the Social <br />Services Board to use the $10,000 to provide subsidies for children to attend other camps, she <br />would like to monitor this new situation and see how it affects children who are not able to <br />attend a camp and reconsider if this is something that reflects the County's goals. Chair <br />Jacobs agreed. <br />Chair Jacobs said that he appreciates the RPAC's concerns. He thinks that the County <br />is going to move toward engaging RPAC and staff in more strategic thinking about the future <br />with Parks and Recreation. He said that if the County is going to consider eliminating tax <br />increases, then programs will have to be eliminated and this is just the tip of the iceberg. There <br />is a limit to what the County can fund. He agrees with looking at places where services are <br />duplicated. He is concerned about the proposed continued growth of exercise facilities at one <br />of the senior centers when there are people in the private sector who provide exercise facilities. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Foushee to <br />approve the proposal and the designation of $10,000 from the Department of Social Services <br />Childcare Program to fund an Orange County scholarship /campership program to support <br />participants' attendance at the three summer day camp programs noted above. Also, the <br />Board will monitor the effect of this action and revisit this in the fall to see if goals are being <br />met. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />Steve Peck asked for a written response about the rationale, and Chair Jacobs said that <br />he could have the minutes when they are available. <br />b. Naming of County Owned Buildings and Facilities Pollcy <br />The Board considered reviewing and discussing the Naming of County Owned Buildings <br />and Facilities Policy originally adopted by the BOCC on February 21, 1989 and revised on <br />November 9, 2005, and providing feedback to staff on any proposed changes. <br />Laura Blackmon said that there are quite a few new buildings coming online next year — <br />the Tweeter Building, an office building, the Orange senior center, etc. — and she wanted to <br />make sure that the Board was comfortable with the policy that was developed in 1989 and <br />revised in 2005. <br />Chair Jacobs said that, whatever is done, he would like to disseminate it to all advisory <br />boards and highlight that the naming of any facility is ultimately in the sole discretion of the <br />Board of County Commissioners. He thinks that a mixed message has been sent to some <br />advisory boards. <br />Laura Blackmon said that there are also some complications because some buildings <br />need to keep certain names because of the services offered there. For example, the Link <br />Center is also the Government Services Center. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that for general buildings with County services, her <br />preference would be to name the building as such, as opposed to naming it for a person. <br />Chair Jacobs suggested for #1 adding at the end, "Naming buildings and facilities is at <br />the sole discretion of the Board of County Commissioners." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.