Orange County NC Website
11 <br />It A <br />1 Aubrey Graham asked if this means that the procedure would start immediately. <br />2 <br />3 Chair Jacobs said that it still has to be reviewed by other entities before starting. <br />4 County Engineer Paul Thames said that there are several review processes, but bids <br />5 will be accepted about this time next year. The EPA will have to go through the bids, as will the <br />6 Attorney and the Engineers to make sure that everything is kosher. From then on, it is a 1 Y2 to <br />7 2 -year process. <br />8 Commissioner Foushee recommended that Mr. Graham get a copy of the abstract, <br />9 because it has a lot of information. <br />10 <br />11 A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Foushee to <br />12 close the public hearing. <br />13 A motion was made by Commissioner Foushee, seconded by Commissioner Gordon to <br />14 approve funding of the entire Northern Buckhorn Community and central Efland sewer project, <br />15 as well as the upgrades to the McGowan Creek pumping station, with funding shortfalls, not <br />16 covered by grants, to be financed by funds advanced against FY 2010 -11 alternative financing. <br />17 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />18 <br />19 6. Regular Agenda <br />20 a. Summer Day Camp Proposal <br />21 The Board considered appropriating $10,000 from the Department of Social Services <br />22 Childcare Program to fund sponsorships for certain summer day camp programs in lieu of <br />23 continuing the County's summer day camp program. <br />24 Laura Blackmon said that at the last Board meeting she brought forth the proposal for <br />25 the summer day camp of appropriating $10,000 for camperships for qualifying summer day <br />26 camp participants in lieu of the County's summer day camp, with the proposal that the funds be <br />27 used for three camps — 4 -H, Triangle Sportsplex, and Orange County Schools. The Social <br />28 Services Board would have to approve the $10,000 that it has in surplus this year in childcare <br />29 subsidy. There is a letter in the packet from the Recreation and Parks Advisory Council <br />30 regarding this. The staff is asking for approval to move forward with the camperships. The <br />31 Department of Social Services will qualify individuals with a sliding scale and a first -come, first <br />32 served basis. Should the Board decide to reinstitute the summer camp next year, there are no <br />33 funds budgeted. <br />34 <br />35 PUBLIC COMMENT <br />36 Steve Peck, Chair of the RPAC, said that the RPAC is unanimous in its opposition to <br />37 discontinuing the summer camp. There was a letter sent in February and the RPAC came and <br />38 spoke to the Board in March. He said that the RPAC is really dismayed about this and realizes <br />39 that it is too late to backup on this year. He appreciates the consideration of scholarship <br />40 money. The RPAC would strongly recommend this program going back in next year. He said <br />41 that many of the members of RPAC, past and present, actually attended this camp or were <br />42 counselors. He said that the RPAC members were not asked what they thought about this very <br />43 much, and when the opinions were voiced, nothing came back to explain the rationale. <br />44 Regarding financial implications, the camp had a $3,600 shortfall, and this could have been <br />45 made up in many ways. He hopes that the Board will reinstate the camp in the new fiscal year. <br />46 Commissioner Gordon made reference to the rationale and said that one of the things <br />47 that has been cited by the Manager is that the program costs the County money. She asked if <br />48 this was the only rationale. <br />49 Laura Blackmon said that the financial reasons were not why she was looking at <br />50 discontinuing the camp. Part of the reason is that as the County grows, as the Lands Legacy <br />