Orange County NC Website
would be renewed annually and subject to revocation if hauling regulations are not <br />followed. <br />F. Development of Facilities..~taffing and Space Needs <br />10 <br />The Solid Waste Staff is .developing a schedule of facilities needs, staffing, space needs <br />and cost estimates for implementing the ordinance that will be more fully presented in an <br />upcoming report as detailed in the timeline and following additional BOCC guidance. <br />One of the early tasks proposed is to authorize and hire a recycling education and <br />outreach specialist dedicated to development of this C&D materials recycling regulation. <br />Once the preliminary education work is done, the nature of the position may change to <br />become more enforcement-oriented vis-a-vis education oriented. <br />G. Enforcing Regulations on Regulated Recyclable Materials in the non=C&D <br />waste stream <br />At this point, the ordinance, while broadly written, is intended to apply to regulation of <br />recyclable C&D wastes in order to reduce the landfilling or other disposal of wastes in a. <br />C&D landfill and increase their recycling. However, there aze many instances where the <br />regulated_recyclable materials can be found in the waste to be disposed with MSW. This <br />is especially true for scrap metal and small amounts o#'unpainted, untreated solid wood. <br />There will be some very small amount of unpainted untreated dry wall but this is <br />insignificant. The most recent waste sort of the MSW waste stream conducted in fall <br />1999 and spring 2000 showed the following wood, scrap metal and dry wall disposed <br />with MSW: <br />Table 4 <br />Percentages of regulated recvclable_materials in Orange County MSW <br />Material Residential Multi-Family Commercial Total est. tons of <br /> 24,000 total 6,000 total 30,000 total regulated recyclable <br /> tons/ r. tons/ r. tons/ r. materials <br />Clean lumber 1.5% 1.S% 2.4% 1,170 <br />and allets <br />Scrap Metal (not 1.7% 2.2% 2% 1,140 <br />incl.cans <br />wall N/a N/a N/a N/a <br />Total 3.2% (770 tons) 3.7% (220 tons) 4.4% (1,320 2,310 (--4% of MSV~ <br /> tons <br />The question is "Should re fated re clable materials be prohibited from disposal when <br />they aze mixed with MSW?" The obvious answer is "yes", they are regulated rec cly able <br />materials no matter where they are disposed. The education and enforcement effort to <br />encompass the MSW waste stream would be significant and there are now very limited <br />opportunities for the general public to dispose properly of the regulated recyclable <br />materials that might be incidentally included in the their residential or commercial waste. <br />For example, the old, bent bicycle wheel might be disposed by a resident with his regular <br />trash, but the load of trash might then be rejected by the hauler who would be subject to <br />losing his hauling license or financial penalties if the metal were in his load. This scrap <br />metal is not readily accepted in the recycling drop off centers, or curbside containers. <br />to <br />