Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
32 <br />1 • There are no designated streams on the property. <br />2 • The site is mostly wooded. <br />3 Adjacent Land Use: <br />4 • Properties to the east and south are owned by the Triangle Land Conservancy and were a part of the <br />S original tract, of which this is the remaining tract., <br />6 • Falls of New Hope subdivision is to the north across Mt. Sinai Road, and the property to the west is <br />7 undeveloped. <br />8 Proposed: <br />9 Roads: <br />10 • Access is from Mt. Sinai Road with two new public roads proposed in the subdivision. <br />11 • One cul-de-sac will extend south from Mt. Sinai Road and another shorter cul-de-sac will extend east <br />12 from the first cul-de-sac. <br />13 • All roads are to be constructed to NCDOT standazds. <br />14 Open SpaceBuffers: <br />15 • Triangle Land Conservancy owns property to the east and south. This tract is the remaining parcel of the <br />16 Creek Wood development. <br />17 • Type A 30-foot buffer required along Mt. Sinai Road. <br />18 Water-Sewer: <br />19 • Community water system <br />20 • Septic systems with an easement provided for lots 2 and 3 <br />21 Agency Comments: <br />22 Comments attached from Environmental Health, NCDOT, and Emergency Management. <br />23 Development Process, Schedule, and Action <br />24 Planning Board: <br />25 • First Action: Concept Plan approved by the Planning Board March 1, 2000 with the following <br />26 condition: <br />27 1. The intersection and road alignment on the Preliminary Plan shall meet NCDOT standards. <br />28 • Second Action: <br />29 1. Action within two regulazly scheduled Planning Board meetings, or extension thereof; <br />30 2. If the Planning Board fails to act within the specified time period, application forwarded to BOCC <br />31 with Planning Boazd minutes and Planning Staff recommendations and conditions. <br />32 Preliminary Plan addresses all conditions of approval of the Concept Plan. <br />33 FINANCIAL ]MPACT: Fiscal Impact Analysis included as an attachment. <br />34 <br />35 RECOMMENDATION(S): Planning Staff <br />36 Approval, in accordance with the attached Resolution of Approval. <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 Kirk clarified that there would be separate septic systems, but a community well system. <br />40 <br />41 Barrows asked about: the septic easement for lots 2 and 3. Kirk said that the easement was 300-400 feet. <br />42 <br />43 Woods asked why the septic easement for lots 2 and 3 follow outside the right-of-way of the cul-de-sac <br />44 instead of crossing it. Jack Srnyre with Kimley-Horn said that this was done on purpose because there was <br />45 ,some discomfort from the County Attorney and NCDOT when the right-of-way was crossed in the earlier <br />46 section of Creek Wood. He said that the owner of lot 4 was aware that the septic line would cross the <br />47 driveway. <br />48 <br />49 Benedict asked if there was a way to add a sleeve in between lots 3 and 4 to provide extra protection from the <br />50 septic line far lot 4. <br />51 <br />