Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-03-2000-9e
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2000
>
Agenda - 10-03-2000
>
Agenda - 10-03-2000-9e
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 2:42:17 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 11:21:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/3/2000
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9e
Document Relationships
Minutes - 10-03-2000
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2000
Minutes - 10-10-2000
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORANGE COUNTY <br />BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br />ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br />Meeting Date: October 3, 2000 <br />Action Agenda <br />Item No. ~~ <br />SUBJECT: Govinda Hills Minor Subdivision/Paste A eat of Private Road Standards <br />DEPARTMENT: Planning <br />PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N) No <br />ATTACHMENT(S): <br />Appeal Application (3a-5) <br />Vicinity Map (6) <br />Private Road Justification Standards (7-8) <br />Class B Subdivision Road Cross Section (9) <br />Curve Radius Diagram (10) <br />Minor Subdivision Plat (11) <br />INFORMATION CONTACT: <br />Tom King, Planner II, ext. 2607 <br />Craig Benedict, Director, ext. 2.592 <br />TELEPHONE NUMBERS: <br />Hillsborough 732181 <br />Chapel Hill 968501 <br />Durham 688-7331 <br />Mebane 336-227-2031 <br />PURPOSE: To consider an appeal from Mr. Scott Pasley regarding a staff technical <br />decision to deny Govinda Hills, Phase 3 minor subdivision. The private road standard <br />justification requires: <br />(1) that each lot must be at least twice the minimum required lot size to justify the use of <br />a private road, and, as a secondary note, even though not noted in the applicant's <br />appeal application, the existing private road (Govinda Drive) be upgraded to current <br />Class B private road standards in regards to drainage, curve radius for public safety <br />vehicles, and slope. <br />Update: To summarize, the suggestion has been given to Mr. Pasley to reduce the <br />number of proposed lots from four (4) to three (3) in order to meet the private road <br />extension justification. In addition, the existing private road is substandard and it would <br />not be prudent to permit more lots until additional travel width gravel, drainage ditches <br />and proper turning radii for emergency vehicles are added. <br />Mr. Pasley was helped by staff early in his process correcting his surveyor's idea that a <br />portion of his land was in the watershed cirtical area. The would have caused lots to be <br />larger. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.