Orange County NC Website
27 <br />Wilson Efland Subdivision <br />Dedication of Corridor for Potential Future Linear Recreation <br />"Pros and Cons'f <br />Issue: Should the County require dedication of a strip of land along McGowan Creek <br />floodplain from the developers of the Wilson Efland minor subdivision? Because land is <br />being subdivided into two lots, the current land dedication requirement would yield a <br />strip of land 10 feet X 218 feet. If the payment -in -lieu alternative were selected, payment - <br />in -lieu of dedication would be $422. <br />Proposed Method to Address Long -Term: Staff is working on a report for the <br />November 1 BOCC meeting clarifying the process for acquisitions through development. <br />This report will address the process for approval of dedication versus payment -in -lieu, <br />amendments to clarify this section of the Subdivision Regulations, and a range or "menu" <br />of possible priority areas where land dedication would be most appropriate. The findings <br />of this report would then be incorporated into amendments to the Subdivision <br />Regulations at a subsequent public hearing, as well as into next year's update to the <br />Master Recreation and Parks Element of the Comprehensive Plan. <br />Pro <br />• Several major developments along the McGowan Creek corridor have the potential to <br />create a linear park or wildlife corridor along the creek <br />• Long -term linkages: This corridor could link public .spaces near McGowan Creek to <br />the County's new McGowan Creek Preserve (and eventually, beyond that to <br />Hillsborough's Riverwalk and Eno River State Park). Such a network would also <br />connect to a long -term "Cane Creek to Eno River" Rustic Woodland Trail, which was <br />identified in the Joint Master Recreation and Parks report. Finally, the potential exists <br />for this corridor to be part of the new "Mountains -to -Sea Trail" State Park, which was <br />adopted into the State Park system this legislative session. <br />• The corridor could be reserved pending a future decision on how it would ultimately <br />be used (wildlife corridor or future linear park) <br />• The Efland area has been identified on existing land use maps as a transition area <br />where development is anticipated and is occurring. <br />• Efland will be a dramatically changing area in the next 10 -20 years, and may need <br />this corridor - which is the only green corridor in the community. <br />• If there is desire for a linear park in the future, land dedicated now and in the future <br />by developments in this area could provide most of the linear park. If not acquired <br />now, land for a linear park along McGowan Creek could be a very expensive (and <br />difficult) purchase for a future board. <br />• Concerns about future trails and crime /safety could be addressed through fencing of <br />the linear park/wildlife corridor in areas of close proximity to private homes. (Our <br />research to date does not support serious crime /safety problems along linear <br />parks /public trails). <br />• Dedication of the land for active recreation/passive recreation and open space is to <br />address the recreation and open space needs of current and future residents. Future <br />residents of a much - larger Efland may desire a linear park in the future. <br />