Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-05-2000-9b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2000
>
Agenda - 09-05-2000
>
Agenda - 09-05-2000-9b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 5:33:44 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 11:20:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/5/2000
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 09-05-2000
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2000
RES-2000-076 Resolution approving The Woodlands (Formerly Nine Gates) Preliminary Plat
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING & L~TSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT <br />P05T OFFICE BOX Sl$1 306-F REVERE ROAD <br />HILLSBOROI7GH, NORTH CAROLINA 2727$ <br />~~wnt~ a e. <br />d~ '+. <br />u <br />EROSION CONTROL DMSION <br />Carrporo/Chapel Hill 968501 burham 688-7331 Hillsborough 732-81$1 Mebane 227-2031 <br />Telephone Extension 2586 FAX 919-644-3002 <br />Memorandum <br />TO: Craig Benedict, Planning Director <br />FROM: warren Faircloth, Erosion Control Supervisor <br />SVHJECT: Woodlands Subdivision <br />Hydrologic & Hydraulic Engineering Report <br />DATE: August 1, 2000 <br />The report answers questions about the culvert under Nine Gates <br />Road but does not address other questions about increased flow <br />through the Cox property. The illustration in the report <br />demonstrates the benefits of using a 54" culvert instead of the 24" <br />pipe to handle the existing flow without overtopping the road. This <br />is a NC DOT requirement. - <br />The report just states the increase in the rate of runoff from the <br />8 lots through the Cox property. It does not address the effects, <br />if any, this increase will have on the existing wet soil or on the <br />diversion that conveys runoff in a path different than that shown <br />on the topographic map. (The engineer would not have been aware of <br />this man made diversion unless he went onto the Cox property.) It <br />appears that the increased runoff through the Cox woods and pasture <br />will not will not have significant impact since the flow follows <br />the existing, natural flow path. The path is not developable <br />because of the poor soil and any structures would have to be built <br />outside of the~drainageway. <br />The suggestion has been made to retain the temporary sediment basin <br />as a permanent stormwater detention basin above the Cox property. <br />A basin would have to be properly sized, particularly the outlet, <br />to provide any benefits. Given the large lots, retention of <br />vegetation, limits on impervious surface, and use of grass swales <br />the need for a basin is questionable. If provided, the homeowners <br />association should maintain the basin. <br />a <br />/~57 6-14-00 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.