Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-05-2000-9b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2000
>
Agenda - 09-05-2000
>
Agenda - 09-05-2000-9b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 5:33:44 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 11:20:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/5/2000
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 09-05-2000
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2000
RES-2000-076 Resolution approving The Woodlands (Formerly Nine Gates) Preliminary Plat
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br />9. Submit verification that the requirements of NCGS Chapter 70 Article 3 Unmarked Human Burial and <br />Human Skeletal Remains Protection Act have been met or will be met. <br />Second Action: <br />• Planning Board consideration of the' Preliminary Plat, on May 4, 2000, resulted in a tie vote (4-4). <br />• Planning Board discussion focused on the requirements for, and impact of, a Jones Ferry Road <br />turning lane, which resulted in a tie vote. Planning Staff has recommended the need for a left <br />turn lane. <br />• The Application is forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Board <br />minutes, and the Planning Staff recommendations and resolution for approval. <br />Third Action: <br />Board of County Commissioners considered the Preliminary Plat, on June 6, 2000, and deferred <br />their vote for additional analysis on four issues. <br />(a) Potential Impact to adjacent property owners <br />1.) Verification of existing drainage ditch <br />2.) Potential for increased stormwater runoff <br />3.) Impact of turn lane <br />4.) Potential for significant tree loss and negative impact on existing wildlife populations <br />(b) Traffic Impact of Subdivision - <br />(c) Clarification of Planning Board discussion and intent of tie vote <br />(d) Explanation of lot sire <br />Staff Findings: <br />(a) Planning 8~ Erosion Control Staff visited the Cox property on Tuesday, June 14, 2000 <br />1.) A manmade ditch extends northwest along low section of property near bam (See photo 1) <br />2.) The northern third of proposed lots will drain north toward Cox property per construction drawings <br />• Physical topography is more complex than contour lines an construction drawings document <br />• Potential impact to Cox property is difficult to determine with accuracy, project engineer may have tc <br />adjust plans as work progresses and drainage patterns become more evident (See memos from <br />Warren Faircloth, Erosion Control Supervisor) <br />3.) Driveway for O'Daniel property is located slightly southwest of high point in Jones Feny Road <br />• Nine Gates Road is situated just beyond (further west) of O'Daniel property (See photo 2) <br />• If designed and constructed properly, left tum lane will likely drain southwest along Jones Feny <br />Road <br />4.) Existing tree line extends beyond 60-foot Nine Gates right-of--way on either side (See photo 3) <br />• Extent of tree line varies along length of road <br />• There appears to be no less than 3 feet of wooded area between edge of right-of--way and O'Daniel <br />property in any one area (See photo 4) <br />(b) Anticipating nine trips per day, per lot, the 41-lot subdivision could generate approximately 364 <br />additional car-trips along Jones Ferry Road (See photos 5, 6--Jones Feny Raad at the entrance to NinE <br />Gates Road) <br />(c) The Planning Board, at a special mid-month meeting on June 21, 2000, clarified the intent of their tiE <br />vote on The Woodlands Preliminary Plat proposal (May 4, 2000 meeting). <br />• The Planning Board Ghair stated that the left turn lane was the source of disagreement. <br />• The applicant has since agreed to install the turn lane and has addressed neighbo <br />opposition to the turn lane. <br />• The Board's voted unanimously on June 21, 2000 to recommend the project for approval. <br />• (See enclosed June 21 minutes, attachment 12 ~ 13. <br />(d) Lot size and number determined at the concept plan approval stage (Refer to previous sections of star <br />report) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.