Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-05-2000-5e
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2000
>
Agenda - 09-05-2000
>
Agenda - 09-05-2000-5e
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/1/2008 10:06:28 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 11:20:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/5/2000
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5e
Document Relationships
Minutes - 09-05-2000
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2000
RES-2000-074 Resolution approving the statutorily required Orange County Solid Waste Plan update for 2000
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br />Solid Waste Plan Framework for Orange County, North Carolina <br />The waste reduction plan framework for mixed solid waste includes: <br />Waste prevention: [The first three items below can be considered by County Solid <br />Waste Management Department through Orange Community Recycling. The last two -- <br />mandatory recycling and volume-based solid waste costs -could be enacted by the <br />individual local governments only.] <br />1. Public education -- increases in the amount, type and targeted audiences. <br />2. Differential landfill fees -- we have these in place now far yazd waste, clean <br />wood waste and corrugated cazdboard. Higher or lower fees could be applied, to other <br />materials to encourage their diversion from the landfill in favor of some type of <br />separation. <br />3. Non-economic incentives -- this includes all the other strategies for influencing <br />waste reduction such as the solid waste plans now required for new, non-residential <br />construction in Chapel Hill. <br />4. Mandatory recycling -- also known as collection bans, individual governments <br />could apply a vaziety of bans in each sector -- residential, commercial or apartments. <br />Some enforcement would be necessary for success. <br />S. Volume-based fees -- also known as pay-per-throw, treats solid waste as a <br />utility. Under this approach, local governments. would set up a system of user fees under <br />which residents and businesses would pay for varying amounts of garbage collected. A <br />proper fee structure with goad enforcement has proven to reduce waste in many other <br />'communities. <br />RecyclablesCollection: <br />The original plan faarework includes recommendation of weekly universal recycling <br />collection in incorporated areas for residential, commercial and apartments and also for <br />commercial recycling is unincorporated areas. For the unincorporated areas, the County <br />recommends continuation of biweekly curbside recycling in the relatively densely <br />settled subdivisions, combined with the system of sanitation sites such as now exist for <br />solid waste and recycling collection. Currently, there is no universal commercial <br />recycling. That would be the biggest single new collection expense; it would also have <br />the greatest potential for increasing recycling. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.