Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-05-2000-5b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2000
>
Agenda - 09-05-2000
>
Agenda - 09-05-2000-5b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/1/2008 10:08:39 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 11:20:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/5/2000
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 09-05-2000
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2000
RES-2000-073 Resolution Transferring Control of a Cable Television Franchise from Time Warner, Inc. to America Online, Inc.
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• TWE serves 12.6 million subscribers, or 15.3 percent of MVPD subscribers nationwide <br />Without divestitures, the merged AT&T-MediaOne would serve 34.4 million subscribers or <br />41.8% of MVPD subscribers, which represents 51.32% of nationwide cable subscribers. <br />?~ <br />Enforcement of the Cable Horizontal Ownership Rules, <br />On May 19, 2000, the U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Columbia upheld the constitutionality <br />of the statute underlying the FCC's rules on cable horizontal ownership. That court decision <br />automatically lifted the FCC's voluntary stay and the agency immediately began enforcing its <br />30% horizontal ownership limit. <br />Section 613 and the FCC's Cable Horizontal Ownership Rules <br />1. 1992 Cable Act required the FCC to set a horizontal ownership limit for cable. <br />2. Daniels Cablevision challenged the constitutionality ofthe statute in District Court. <br />3. September 1993 -District Court agreed that the statute was unconstitutional. <br />4. FCC appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for District of Columbia Circuit. <br />5. FCC adopted 30% as the ownership limit, but voluntarily stayed enforcement of the rule <br />because of the District Court's ruling. <br />6. Time Warner challenged the 30% rule as unconstitutional in the U.S. Court of Appeals for <br />the <br />District of Columbia Circuit. <br />7. D.C. Circuit Court consolidated the challenge to the statute (Daniels) and the challenge to the <br />rules (Time Warner). <br />8. On October 8, 1999, the FCC revised its 30% ownership limit to account for all multichannel <br />video program distributor (MVPD) subscribers, not just cable homes passed. <br />9. The D.C. Circuit Court decided to consider separately the challenge to the statute and the <br />challenge to the FCC rules. <br />10. On May 19, 2000, the D.C. Circuit Court upheld the constitutionality ofthe statute requiring <br />ownership limits. The FCC's voluntary stay on enforcing its rules was automatically lifted. <br />11. D.C. Circuit Court will heaz oral arguments on the FCC rules on October 17, 2000. <br />Franchise Fee U-Tax Auditing & Cable Television Administration <br />101 Pocono Lane, Cary, North Carolina 27513-5316 Voice # 919.467.5392 Fax # 919.460.6868 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.