Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-15-2000-9e
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2000
>
Agenda - 08-15-2000
>
Agenda - 08-15-2000-9e
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 5:34:17 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 11:20:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/15/2000
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9e
Document Relationships
Minutes - 08-15-2000
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2000
RES-2000-071 Resolution approving The Woodlands (formerly Nine Gates) Preliminary Plat
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5: <br />ORANGE COUNrrY PLANNING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT <br />POST OFFICE BOX 8181 306-F REVERE ROAD <br />HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27278 <br />d= - <br />EROSION CONTROL DIVISION <br />Carrboro/Chapel Hill 968-4501 Durham 688-7331 Hillsborough 732-8181 Mebane 227-2031 <br />Telephone Extension 2586 FAX 91944-3002 <br />Memorandum <br />TO: Craig Benedict, Planning Director <br />FROM: Warren Faircloth, Erosion Control Supervisor <br />SUBJECT: Woodlands Subdivision <br />Hydrologic & Hydraulic Engineering Report <br />DATE: August 1, 2000 <br />The report answers questions about the culvert under Nine Gates <br />Road but does not address other questions about increased flow <br />through the Cox property. The illustration in the report <br />demonstrates the benefits of using a 54" culvert instead of the 24" <br />pipe to handle the existing flow without overtopping the road. This <br />is a NC DOT requirement. <br />The report just states the increase in the rate of runoff from the <br />8 lots through the Cox property. It does not address the effects, <br />if any, this increase will have on the existing wet soil or on the <br />diversion that conveys runoff in a path different than that shown <br />on the topographic map. (The engineer would not have been aware of <br />this man made diversion unless he went onto the Cox property.) It <br />appears that the increased runoff through the Cox woods and pasture <br />will not will not have significant impact since the flow follows <br />the existing, natural flow path. The path is not developable <br />because of the poor soil and any structures would have to be built <br />outside of the drainageway. <br />The suggestion has been made to retain the temporary sediment basin <br />as a permanent stormwater detention basin above the Cox property. <br />A basin would have to be properly sized, particularly the outlet, <br />to provide any benefits. Given the large lots, retention of <br />vegetation, limits on impervious surface, and use of grass swales <br />the need for a basin is questionable. If provided, the homeowners <br />association should maintain the basin. <br />N57 6-14-00 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.