Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
SEMI' ~ UN. z1. X000 1~~ 56PM CRANGc CTY h1GRt' ~~~ ~ '' "''~' ` <br />N0.555'- --~.5i5 <br />45 <br />~ Kimley-Horn <br />~ ~ and Associates, Inc. <br />2) 5yst~sm A is act ea6ier system to Construct and extend <br />3) Msintetuaicc requirea~gepLs ate clifferettt 2nd place the <br />dii~brent locations. <br />A would be setvued by vop~act with OW A <br />boas Manager of Ow1lSA has ~srimstod that it wou <br />year ~ lsrovide ta-icc weeik~{y preventative maintea8u <br />statia~n. He cstia~aties this as the iaczemental cost to <br />existing >~tlbmd pump Smtida oe the same top. This <br />home per y~~ R,opsacement pacts i~£ncoded would <br />Couary Commissioners <br />7uae 2D, ZlwO <br />Pin: 2 <br />a phased bash;. <br />in tW0 <br />Joha Gr~cen, ()~ersl~ <br />;osi. about X4,000 FQ <br />to the proposed puasp <br />ve this sitie and the <br />~s m abattt S90 per <br />~~~ <br />~ places the rpainteaaa~ce responsibility om individual 'home <br />owner. we hava ~a to the lnxn that providoa ' ~ m homcowa- <br />erR at the (iovamocs Q~ develapaaeat south of Cho Hill, Thin develop. <br />went has abatat 400 ho>nea wim individual pump <br />Ct was rCported to us that the mamts~aace company rv m aihout 3 calla <br />per week fiom individual home owaera. This frcq y ras'ttlts In an average <br />of 1 problem per home rutty two yam. '!he cost of is ahrn~t 500 <br />per aal I. Rep~xR+cnt vEpiunpa appears to cast about 1,000 sad tbn lith <br />span of the pups is appraximauly 10 years. <br />The aignificaat difforcacc between the systGma is rhos a group, the iuturc <br />of Richsttoad Hilla ae+e aot as well equipped beadle the emer- <br />gency repairs ss wCn as others might be and with S A, the twix <br />weekly checlatp by OWASA staff woaild provide for higher lcv~el orpt~e- <br />vetttatrvc msioter~ce. <br />4) ~undiag Solaces <br />Tt appears that Syasarn A faIIs Gotupletcly within tlx pstamelers of <br />fedaal gra:<t money for iofrasbvcture while System may not, Ftubiiat is <br />e~plaripg t8e limitations that might be placed upon o finulinq withre~ <br />speet to the i9sue oP `~.fras~ivcture" versus individual of devdo~t emits. <br />!t is otia o~pistisau that Raehrnohd &'Us would be best with Syateaa A foe <br />bath aost and ~ rebate. Overrll cost is lower by coaaaom-g with <br />OWA.9,A theft is as an call agency with ~la,l familiarity the pump atatidn <br />~ its waddy condition. Prttve~tive mains w 6e far easiex with <br />System A than Syrtem R is our opiniati. <br />