Orange County NC Website
12 <br />Geoffrey Gledhill said that the upgrade of the road is required to service the new subdivided lots. <br />Once the upgrade is done, then all of the lots in the subdivision are jointly responsible for maintaining the <br />road to the upgraded standard. <br />Commissioner Jacobs made reference to the 18-foot travel way and asked if that included the <br />swells or if it was just the actual road surtace. <br />Craig Benedict said that 18 feet was just the actual road surtace and that the impermeability that <br />comes forward from both public and private roads still is counted as the entire roadway. After the swell goes <br />up to the 50-foot area, then there is a certain amount of impervious that would be counted in the remaining <br />50 feet. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked if it was the same amount of shoulder that must be cleared <br />regardless of whether it is a public or private road. <br />Craig Benedict said that typically there is the surtace course, afour-foot swell down and afour- <br />foot swell up and then whatever can be preserved after' that. <br />Commissioner Jacobs made reference to page 13 and read the first paragraph which says, <br />"Private roads serving more than 10 lots or dwelling units may be permitted only if constructed to NCDOT <br />public road standards," and said that this contradicts everything which has gone before it: <br />Craig Benedict said that this statement could be deleted. <br />Commissioner Jacobs made reference to Class A versus Class B private roads and asked if the <br />staff has looked into the cost of hiring a professional engineer. <br />Craig Benedict said that the staff has checked into the costs for engineers and the determination <br />of one road over the other is negligible in cost because it is the engineer's time to go out and see if the road <br />meets the standards. He said that one of the most important things is if the County is going to continue to <br />have private roadways, the hazards of living on a private road should be reduced as much as possible by <br />having the road certified to the standards. He said that drainage is the key for private roads,, and that is <br />where the biggest failing is. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that DOT had set up a committee to work on subdivision standards <br />and he is concerned that the County is locking themselves in and not allowing any flexibility. He is <br />concerned that there would be no allowance if there were some significant natural resource or rural <br />characteristic of the property that might be enhanced by having a private road as opposed to a public road. <br />He questions eliminating flexibility in the concept plan amendments. He would prefer that the plan be <br />presented for comment to the Planning Board and the County Commissioners before the staff makes a <br />ruling. <br />Craig Benedict said that some of the language could be changed to allow for some flexibility. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that he would like to have incentives for people to do things the way <br />the County would want them to, not making it as a right, but a privilege. <br />Commissioner Brown asked if the Planning staff could specify the reasons for modifications of <br />the regulations. <br />Craig Benedict said that a checklist could be implemented and reviewed to be sure the private <br />road standards meet the goals of the E3oard of County Commissioners. <br />Commissioner Brown said that she would like the consumer, the one buying the lots, to be <br />protected by the quality of road that is being constructed. She asked for more information on the process of <br />getting an engineer to evaluate the road standards and Craig Benedict described this process. <br />Chair Carey asked if there were some procedural problems if the process for the concept plan is <br />changed and the County Commissioners approve the concept plan. <br />Geoffrey Gledhill said that it is not uncommon in administrative law to do this kind of process. <br />He thinks the objective of the Planning staff is to move non-advisory functions of the Planning Board to the <br />County Commissioners. <br />Chair Carey said that he feels that the Planning Board staff should review the project and not the <br />Board of County Commissioners. <br />Commissioner Gordon made reference to the private road justification and asked if there is <br />something along that line for existing roads. She said that this regulation could result in a loss of trees which <br />would not be the best thing for the County. <br />Craig Benedict said that he would work with the Attorney on language to address the issue for <br />existing roads. <br />Commissioner Halkiotis said that he fails to see anything wondertul about roads that are gravel <br />where everything is covered with dust. He asked if there was any County staff that could certify the roads as <br />meeting state standards. <br />Craig Benedict said that for private roads, there is not any qualified staff to certify the roads. He <br />said that DOT is now coming to the Development Review Committee on a biweekly basis to discuss the road <br />standards. <br />