Orange County NC Website
<br />9 <br />4 <br />i Crauford Goodwin asked about the logic of this change and said that it seems that the concern is <br />z the taking of the right and compensating the property owner in soma way, Craig il3enedict said that the <br />3 consequence would be that a neighbor would see that a business might move cl©ser or adjacent to a <br />a person's property fine. He;said that the neighbor would receive a notification of any changes made. <br />5 Commissioner Gordon asked about the question of what to do with abandofied property. Craig <br />6 Benedict said that the EC-~ standards do not follow the rule that after 180 days, the use would be lost. <br />~ It is hoped that road improvements would be made in Orange County that may involve a widening of a <br />8 road of the expansion of aq~ intersection. He foresees this as a problem for some businesses in the <br />9 future. If a person abandons the business and later wants to reopen, they would!ihave tv meet the new <br />1o standards and setbacks. <br />11 Commissioner Gardor asked Craig Benedict to put in writing the impacts thi'it would be <br />12 considered. <br />13 Chair Carey asked about a situation which prevents a property from being gontinued in its <br />l4 intended use if it would reveert back to the surrounding land use and Craig Bened~t said that it would <br />1S revert back to the least intensive use, However, the applicant could ask for a rezianing. <br />16 Commissioner Brown; clarified that what this would do is keep the small businesses. She feels it is <br />17 an improvement to offer ark initiative for improving the property, <br />is A motion was made ~y Commissioner Gordon, sewnded by Commissioner IBrown to refer item G <br />19 1-b to the Planning Board ?liar a recommendation to be returned to the Board of Commissioners no <br />20 sooner than June 29, 2000 <br />21 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />22 <br />23 C. Orange County foil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Amendments <br />2a Craig Benedict said that Christy Anspach of the Erosion Control Departrpent is here tonight <br />25 and has contributed a large amount of work towards these changes. This ordinarnce is not part of the <br />26 zoning text or subdivision tgxt. It is a freestanding ordinance. These rules are orbs that have been <br />27 created at the state level amd it is up to the County to put them into the ordinance;. He summarized the <br />z8 changes made to the ordins~nce. The ordinance does not apply to certain land disturbing activities <br />29 which have to do with agricuulture. There are also exemptions for forest land and mining activities. He <br />30 said that the erosion contrdl plan had to match other environmental issues that are attached to the site, <br />31 Some of the notices of violations and penalties have been amended as well, <br />32 <br />33 QUEST1ON5 FROM CAl IIUTV C!AU~u1CQ1AAl~c@ ~r~ r.~ r......... __ _ __ ____ <br />-v I~IV1~lYVIl~7 <br />34 Commissioner Gordo said that gender neutral language should be used throughout. She asked <br />35 about page one regarding ibrestlands and the forest practice guidelines that relate to water quality. <br />36 Craig Benedict said that there were different guidelines for the state because of the preservation of <br />s~ agriculture and forestry, Tlie County's guidelines are mare stringent. <br />38 Commissioner Gordo~h asked about section 18 and the erosion control plan gnd about the <br />39 utilization of ditches for the (purpose of d~watering or lowering the water table. Ci;'aig Benedict said that <br />4o it was a notification provisign so that the Division of Water Quality could know if thps type of land <br />41 disturbance activity could I wen the water table that might affect the farm operation or wells in the area. <br />az Commissioner Gordo~i made reference to page thn:e and the deadline for viewing a plan. She <br />43 said that it seems that this I~nguage sounded very similar to the other language ~at was just revised. <br />44 Craig Benedict said that this refers to staff restrictions for a time frame versus an elected body. <br />4s Commissioner Gordon asked that the issues about the ditches and the fore~xry be brought to the <br />a6 Commission for the Environment for their information. <br />47 Commissioner Jacobi suggested that the staff analyze the forest practice guidelines related to <br />a8 water quality and share comments with the boards before they are submitted. <br />a9 Commissioner Jacobe made reference to page 16, item h, "Consideration ofl:applicant's past <br />so pertormance", and made ark editorial change. <br />51 Crauford Goodwin asl~ed for a definition of plants and animals use far the man. Craig Benedict <br />52 feels the list is wide open -iany plants and animals useful to humans. <br />