Orange County NC Website
SENT JUN .21.2000 12 ~ 56PM ORANGE Cl'Y MGRt' u°i-i" .' <br />(L 1 .pLL ~ 1 V4 ~ <br />N0.555~~ ' P.3i5 <br />45 <br />~ Kimley-Horn <br />~~ ~ Sr1d A550G18~8S, II1G. <br />COUttty Cpnin'LIS810IIer9 <br />Jape 24, 2(~UO <br />Page 2 <br />2) Sysu~m A is an easier system to construct and exmnd ~ a phased baaiy. <br />3) Mainteaanpcc require~xmtls are different and place the >~ottsibiJity in two <br />ditlarent locations. <br />A would lx serviced by contract with OW john Green, t )rers~ <br />bons 11~anager of OW11SA has estir~ted that it would oat about ~4,(lU0 gcc <br />year ~ grovide twice 'weekly pcCVCitt&live maintetlatlc to the Prol~~ g~P <br />station. He gtit~tes this as the iacremental cost to a this sine and the <br />existing >rilamd pumg Smtion an the same top. This trs to about S90 per <br />Same pCt year. Replacement parts if Headed would an cxtaa wsC <br />~ placeF the ma+*reaarce responsibility oa individaal home <br />owner, We Nava spairen to the sam that provide9 ~ tcna~ txt hon~wn- <br />erR ax the Go'uemoxs qub devel~t south of Cba Hill. This devclop~ <br />Bret has about 40D bomeR with ~ pw'nps. <br />It v~r3s reported to us that the mamtraancc compasty re ds Eo about 3 ca1Ls <br />per weeti from individual ~ owaer9. This fitiq y results in at, averngc <br />of 1 problem per home cv~r two years. 'Ibe cast of 'ce is ahrna .1i2QQ <br />per sal I . R~eplacemcal of pumps appears to cost about 1,DDq slid the life <br />span oi•th,e putxtps is apptoxirr~tdy 10 years. <br />The significant di$ercttcc betvr+oen the systems is that a group, the future <br />resid,eats of RictarxtoYUl Sills are not as well equipped laandte the emer- <br />gency repairs as well as others might lac and with S A, the twig <br />weekly checln~p by OWASA staff worttld provide for hi~r level or pre- <br />vetitadve resiiatrsance. <br />a) ~undirtg so~3 <br />rt appc~ that System A falls Completciy within the pa~l~ of <br />federal ant money for ie~frastructure while System may not. Habitat is <br />exploxinr the limitations that miiht be placed upon of furtclin~ with re- <br />spect to the issue of `~a!sas~ctut+c" versus indiviclua~l of develapatiat costs. <br />It is our ap~ioa that Richmond Sills would be hest dev~els <br />hoth acrst ;uid rnaa~otenaxice re~sans. 4vrr-~11 cosrt is lower <br />owAsA there is err, ~- pan aEeacy with wtal ~~liarity <br />sail its weekly condition. Preventative mainter~cc wain, <br />System A than System R is our ogix>on. <br />Kd vhth System A for <br />+d by costtrartng with <br />tb the pump motion <br />be far easiex with <br />