Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-29-2000-5b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2000
>
Agenda - 06-29-2000
>
Agenda - 06-29-2000-5b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 5:53:18 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 11:19:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/29/2000
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 06-29-2000
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
20 <br />• AT&T serves 18.96 million subscribers, or 23 percent of MVPD subscribers nationwide <br />• Excluding its attributable ownership interest in Time Warner Entertainment (TWE), <br />MediaOne serves 5 million subscribers, or 6 percent of MVPD subscribers nationwide <br />• TWE serves 12.6 million subscribers, or 15.3 percent of MVPD subscribers nationwide <br />Without divestitures, the merged AT&T MediaOne would serve 34.4 million subscribers or <br />41.8% of MVPD subscribers, which represents 51.3290 of nationwide cable subscribers. <br />Enforcement of the Cable Horizontal Ownership Rules <br />On May 19, 2000, the U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Columbia upheld the constitutionality <br />of the statute underlying the FCC's rules on cable horizontal ownership. That court decision <br />automatically lifted the FCC's voluntary stay and the agency immediately began enforcing its <br />30% horizontal ownership.limit. <br />Section 613 and the FCC's Cable Horizontal Ownership Rules <br />1. 1992 Cable Act required the FCC to set a horizontal ownership limit for cable. <br />2. Daniels Cablevision challenged the constitutionality ofthe statute in District Court. <br />3. September 1993 -District Court agreed that the statute was unconstitutional. <br />4. FCC appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals far District of Columbia Circuit. <br />5. FCC adopted 30% as the ownership limit, but voluntarily stayed enforcement of the rule <br />because of the District Court's ruling. <br />6. Tirne Warner challenged the 30% rule as unconstitutional in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the <br />District of Columbia Circuit. <br />7. D.C. Circuit Court consolidated the challenge to the statute (Daniels) and the challenge to the <br />rules (Time Warner). <br />S. On October 8, 1999, the FCC revised its 30% ownership limit to account for all multichannel <br />video program distributor (MVPD) subscribers, not just cable homes passed. <br />Franchise Fee U-Tax Auditing & Cable Television Administration <br />101 Pocono Lane, Cary, North Carolina 27513-5316 Voice # 919.467.5392 Fax # 919.460.6868 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.