Orange County NC Website
D~a~~ <br />1 Benedict reiterated the staff's position that the staff does find that the two amendments meet the <br />2 criteria established within the joint planning agreement and the comprehensive plan text <br />3 amendment changes. The staff is recommending that the Planning Board recommend the <br />4 amendments to the County Commissioners for adoption. <br />5 <br />6 Holtkamp asked about the concerns of Carrbora. <br />7 - <br />s Benedict said that Carrboro's concerns have to do with the impacts to the wells that are in the <br />9 `general area of the quarry. He said that since there was a lot of rock in that area, there is not <br />1o much water in the strata. The discussions between American Stone, OWASA, Carrboro, and the <br />11 residents have been primarily on the ability to monitor wells in the area and find out if there is a <br />12 problem related to the quarry operation and not the existing geology of the azea. <br />13 <br />14 Goodwin asked if there had been any consideration of running OWASA water to the residents in <br />15 the quarry area. <br />16 <br />17 Benedict said that this has been discussed. There has been afive-yeaz process to develop a water <br />1 s and sewer boundary agreement between Hillsborough, Chapel Hill, Carrboro, Orange County, <br />19 and OWASA. This happens to be a rural buffer area where water and sewer would not be <br />20 extended. He said that the well situation in the quarry area has not risen to a level of it being a <br />21 major public health risk. The failure rates of water and sewer systems that are occurring in the <br />22 County are not too different than what is occurring in the quarry area. <br />23 <br />24 Gooding-Ray asked if these amendments would affect the County's ability to revoke the Special <br />25 Use Permit. <br />26 <br />27 Benedict said that after these two items, if it were approved through the process, the Special Use <br />28 Permits would have additional protection. The County can revoke a permit any time there is a <br />29 violation. It is intended that there will be additional mitigation measures and stricter regulations <br />30 an the conduct of the quarry than there is now. He said that the staff would suggest that a <br />31 Planned Development Industrial zoning district come forwazd where the uses would be limited <br />32 just for quarry and water resource operations. <br />33 <br />34 Katz mentioned that at the public hearing, it was suggested that the failure rate of the wells in the <br />35 quarry area was much greater than the average failure rate in the County. He asked if this had <br />36 been denied. He also asked about the instances of foundation damage that were noted by the <br />37 residents. He made reference to the official from American Stone that stated that in 30 years <br />38 there had been one complaint, which was not their fault. The afficial did not stay after he spoke <br />39 to listen to the people who had signed up to speak. He believes that the problems with the wells <br />4o in the quarry azea are a result of the blasting and the quazry operations. He made reference to the <br />41 3000-foot radius from the quarry that American Stone is claiming some responsibility. There <br />42 has been a motion to extend this to 6000 feet and he agrees that it should be extended. He made <br />43 reference to the chart that Benedict showed eazlier that indicated the population increases in the <br />44 County over the next 30 years. He said that he did not know if the existing hole at the quarry <br />45 would fill the water needs of the County in 2050. He said that there have been conflicting <br />46 statements about the capacity and the needs. <br />47 <br />48 .Benedict said that there was an extensive discussion at the public heazing about water supply, <br />49 demand, capacity, and availability. He said that the quarry operation has to do with one issue. <br />