Orange County NC Website
9 <br />AT&T's acquisition of MediaOne's 25.51% shaze of Time Warner Entertainment <br />Advance Newhouse will give it a 32% interest in Tirne Worrier's high speed <br />Internet service, Road Runner. When this interest is combined with AT&T's 58% <br />stake in Excite@hame, MediaOne's high-speed Internet service, places AT&T <br />squazely is in the position of dominating the two prominent broadband-cable <br />modem services. <br />The federal ownership statutes limit any one cable operator to no more than 30% <br />of the mazketplace. AT&T's purchase of MediaOne boosted its national market <br />share to 39%. Although, MediaOn-e surrendered its management rights to Time <br />Warner, this did not deter the FCC from ruling that the transaction exceeded the <br />federal limits. The FCC is not enforcing the rule because a federal district court <br />judge in 1993 ruled that the statute authorizing the 30% cap was unconstitutional <br />because it violated the First Amendment. The matter was appealed to the US <br />Court of Appeals in December 1999 and a decision is expected later this year. <br />The FGC believes that the lower court's ruling will be reversed and the 30% <br />statute cap will be upheld. Consequently, the FCC has advised AT&T that they <br />would have 180 days from the date of decision to came into compliance. <br />Compliance could mean that i) AT&T could exchange its Time Warner stake for a <br />sweet heart contract with AOL-Time Warner to provide phone service over theix <br />cable systems or ii) AT&T could divest itself of its Rainbow Media Holdings, <br />Inc., and Liberty Cable properties to comply with the 30% cap rule. <br />MediaOne initially invested $1.5 billion in Road Runner's start-up. This <br />investment's current value approaches $15 billion3. Because of RR's exceptional <br />appreciated value, a buyout ofAT&T's interest by the new entity, AOL -Time <br />Warner, is extremely unlikely because it is cost prohibitive and assets would be <br />better spent tv upgrade existing networks and enhance services. <br />The Open Access Alliance of the Bay (San Francisco) Area conducted a study4 <br />and.subsequently reported that a cable broadband monopoly would result in <br />higher Internet access prices, $5 to $15 monthly, absent competition. <br />The merger validates Open Access as a solid business model for delivery of <br />Internet and telephony via cable. With AT&T as a major player, there can be no <br />doubt that Open Access is compatible with their core business. This means that <br />the intellectual property and technology issues related to Open Access have <br />~'I'alking Up the Deal, Multichannel News, January Z4, 2000. <br />`~TThe Business journal of $an Jose, March 13, 2000. <br />-5- <br />