Orange County NC Website
zs <br />6.23.9 CLUSTERING <br />DISTRICT CLUSTERING REQUIREMENTS. <br />LTNIV-CA Clustering of residential lots is permitted in accordance with Section IV-B-9 of the <br />UNIV-PW Orange County Subdivision Regulations, with the additional provision that each lot <br /> contains a minimum of one acre. <br />U-ENO-CA Clustering of residential lots is permitted in accordance with Section IV-B-10 of <br />U-ENO-PW the Orange County Subdivision Regulations, with the additional provisions: <br /> That each lot of the first 5 lots contains a minimum of one and one-half acres, <br /> outside of the Transition Area, for the initia110 acres. After the initia110 acres, <br /> lots contain a minimu~nnn of 2 acres. <br /> That any major subdivision following a conventional development option shall <br /> have a minimum open space requirement of 15%. <br /> That if greater than 33% but less than 50% open space is achieved and <br /> maintained, a 10% bonus of the lots that are achieved through the density <br /> calculation in this section, can be allocated to the properly. <br /> That if 50% or greater open space is achieved and maintained, a 20% bonus.of <br /> the lots that are achieved through the density calculation in this section, can be <br /> allocated to the property. <br />All Other Clustering of residential lots is permitted in accordance with Section IV-B-1D ofthe <br />Overlay Orange County Subdivision Regulations. <br />Districts <br />6.23.10 APPLICABILITY <br />*Amended 1-17-95; 10.19-99 <br />a) Existing Development <br />Far the purpose of determining compliance with or applicability of Article 6.23 of this <br />Ordinance, existing development is defined as a residential or non-residential structure which <br />1) was constructed prior to January 1, 1994 (October 19, 1999, with respect to the October <br />1999, amendments related to the CANE-GA and CANE-PW districts); or <br />2) was. constructed in accordance with a valid building pernut issued prior to January 1, <br />1994 (October 19, 1999, with respect to the October 19, 1999, amendments related to the <br />CANE-CA and CANE-PW districts); or <br />3) was included as part of a Site Specific Development Flan approved by the Boazd of <br />Commissioners prior to January 1, 1994 (October 19, 1999, with respect to the October <br />19, 1999, amendments related to the CANE-CA and CANE-PW districts); or <br />4) had otherwise established a ,vested right under North Cazolina Zoning .law prior to <br />January 1, 1994 (October 19, 1999, with respect to the October 19, 1999, amendments <br />related to the CANE-CA and CANE-PW districts). <br />Existing development is hereby deemed to be conforming with respect to requirements of Article <br />6.23 of this Ordinance. <br />