Orange County NC Website
1~ ~~~~ ,_3" ;~ <br />_ ~ ~ <br />Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools <br />Lincoln Center Merritt Mill ' ~~ ~'I <br />Road ; ~ ~~ ~, I 0 ?..n~?t~ , <br />Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27516-2881 ~ #~s' ~. <br />s 1~ -. _. <br />The Board of Education Telephone: 919/967-8211 Ext. 226 <br />FAX: (919) 933-4560 <br />Neil G. Pedersen Elizabeth Mason Carter, Chair <br />Superintendent Board of Education <br />Apri17, 2000 <br />Mr. Moses Cazey, Chair <br />Orange County Boazd of County Commissioners <br />P.O. Box 8181 <br />Hillsborough, North Cazolina 27278 <br />Dear Moses: <br />At its regularly scheduled meeting last evening, the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City <br />Board of Education asked that the following feedback be shazed with the Board of County <br />Commissioners regarding the School Funding Options Task Force Report. I have again <br />attached a copy of the February 27, 2000 memo concerning school funding formulas. <br />I believe that consensus was reached by the school board task force members from <br />both districts on the following matters and that these points of consensus have not been <br />adequately recognized publicly: <br />1. It is not possible to answer the question as to how much of the county budget should be <br />earmarked for education. Factors that impact this issue such as the tax base, anticipated <br />revenues, and the economic objectives for the county as well as an array of needs <br />throughout the county are not known to school board members. <br />2. It would be more reasonable to sepazate capital funds from operating funds when <br />determining funding allocations because the capital fund decisions are known and <br />predictable. This would lead to a funding approach as proposed by our district in <br />1VIode16. <br />3. School Board task force members strongly supported aneeds-based approach to <br />educational funding, as captured in our proposed Mode17. <br />4. The school boazd members of the task force voiced appreciation for the Board of <br />County Commissioners' consistent struggle and efforts to meet the needs of education <br />in Orange County and acknowledged that the Board of County Commissioners' sound <br />reasoning and good judgment have served education well in the past and will continue <br />to do so in the future. <br />The Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Boazd of Education encourages a continuing open <br />dialogue with the Board of County Commissioners regarding its budget issues as well as. <br />other issues of common interest between the Board of Education and the County <br />Commissioners. It is believed that discussions need to occur to determine an acceptable <br />definition of "a mandate" and the approaches each boazd pursues to meet its mandates. In <br />addition, discussions are needed regarding the struggles the Board of Education faces in <br />meeting the demands of continual growth within its school system. <br />