Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-17-2000-9c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2000
>
Agenda - 04-17-2000
>
Agenda - 04-17-2000-9c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 2:57:52 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 11:17:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/17/2000
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9c
Document Relationships
Minutes - 04-17-2000
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~} <br />~ ~_ <br />Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools '~'~ W~-~'~~ <br />Lincoln Center, Merritt Mill Road ' ~~' ~ ~ ~~;n~ .` <br />Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27516-2881 ` <br />' ~ ' 1~ .~.. -..•~-.i ~' <br />The Board of Education Telephone: 919/967-8211 Ext. 226 <br />FAX: (919) 933-4560 <br />Neil G. Pedersen Elizabeth Mason Carter, Chair <br />Superintendent Board of Education <br />Apri17, 2000 <br />Mr. Moses Carey, Chair <br />Orange County Board of County Commissioners <br />P.O. Box 8181 <br />Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 <br />Deaz Moses: <br />At its regulazly scheduled meeting last evening, the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City <br />Board of Education asked that the following feedback be shared with the Boazd of County <br />Commissioners regazding the School Funding Options Task Force Report. I have again <br />attached a copy of the February 27, 2000 memo concerning school funding formulas. <br />I believe that consensus was reached by the school board task force members from <br />both districts on the following matters and that these points of consensus have not been <br />adequately recognized publicly: <br />1. It is not possible to answer the question as to how much of the county budget should be <br />earmazked for education. Facfors that impact this issue such as the tax base, anticipated <br />revenues, and the economic objectives for the county as well as an array of needs <br />throughout the county are not -known to school board members. <br />2. It would be more reasonable to sepazate capital funds from operating funds when <br />determining funding allocations because the capital fund decisions are known and <br />predictable. This would lead to a funding approach as proposed by our district in <br />Mode16. <br />3. School Boazd task force members strongly supported aneeds-based approach to <br />educational funding, as captured in our proposed Model 7. <br />4. The school boazd members of the task force voiced appreciation for the Board of <br />County Commissioners' consistent struggle and efforts to meet the needs of education <br />in Orange County and acknowledged that the Boazd of County Commissioners' sound <br />reasoning and good judgment have served education well in the past and will continue <br />to do so in the future. <br />The Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Board of Education encourages a continuing open <br />dialogue with the Board of County Commissioners regazding its budget issues as well as <br />other issues of common interest between the Board of Education and the County <br />Commissioners. It is believed that discussions need to occur to determine an acceptable <br />definition of "a mandate" and the approaches each board pursues to meet its mandates. In <br />addition, discussions are needed regarding the struggles the Boazd of Education faces in <br />meeting the demands of continual growth within its school svstem. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.