Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-17-2000-8i
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2000
>
Agenda - 04-17-2000
>
Agenda - 04-17-2000-8i
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 3:00:01 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 11:17:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/17/2000
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8i
Document Relationships
2000 S Contract - Acquisition of Register of Deeds Imaging System
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\General Contracts and Agreements\2000's\2000
Minutes - 04-17-2000
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~a <br />In other words, business and technical needs are consistent in needing an immediate <br />solution that will relieve the current condition, but one that can be extended to provide <br />solutions to the long-term requirements on the County. <br />2.3 .Options Considered <br />The reports and proposals mentioned above were of two main types; "Build" or "Buy". <br />By "Build" it is understood that we mean: "to enter into a contract with a system house to <br />specify, construct, install, and support a custom system built to satisfy Orange County <br />requirements". By "Buy" we mean: "to purchase software and services necessary to <br />modify or customize, install, and maintain the software on the Orange County technology <br />infrastructure". <br />With these definitions in mind there are three "Buy" options -Hart, Universal Systems, <br />and Mackin Imaging; and two Build options -Keane, and OnSphere. These five <br />comprise the options considered below. <br />2.4 Comparison of Options <br />2.4.1 General Remarks <br />In conversations with Dick Taylor it became apparent that it would be necessary to <br />upgrade the hardware configuration to support whichever system solution would be <br />elected. The configuration needed is largely independent of the solution implemented, <br />being determined rather by requirements for data capacity, access speed and system <br />reliability. Of course, minor variations will be appropriate depending on the software <br />choice; so the final definition of the hardware configuration must be worked out with the <br />solution vendor, and is therefore ~ part of the detailed implementation plan. <br />In view of the above, hardware casts will be ignored in the analysis since it will end up <br />being roughly the same for all options. It goes without saying that it must be considered <br />in the total budgetary planning process. <br />2.4.2 Build vs. Buy: General Differences <br />It may help to interpret the material that follows to keep in mind some of the generic <br />differences between a "Build" and Buy" options in systems procurement: <br />Considerations for "Build": <br />Pro: <br />• The system is custom, hence, directly reflects needs of customer. <br />• Design can accommodate to local policies and infrastructure. <br />Con: <br />Report to Orange County Register of Deeds Apri112, 2000 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.