Orange County NC Website
7.0 <br />- 4 <br />quarry was approved by the Board of Commissioners on October 23, 1981. The permit <br />includes an area referenced as 136 acres, but deeds reflect approximately 151.56 acres. . <br />On May 10, 1990, afour-parry agreement among the three petitioners and Nello L. Teer was signed <br />that will transfer ownership of the current quarry to OWASA when anticipated quarrying ends by <br />the year 2030. OWASA plans to utilize the current quarry as a supplementary reservoir in <br />conjunction with, the existing stone quarry reservoir. The expanded quarry reservoir will have a . <br />capacity of three billion gallons to be filled by a combination of runoff and pumped raw water from <br />Cane Creek reservoir. Raw water transmission lines are in place. <br />Three other activities are planned as an overall project pursuant to the 1990 agreement. First, <br />OWASA will acquire an additional 100-acre buffer area around the proposed reservoir. In addition, <br />Bethel-Hickory Grove Church Road will be relocated east of the existing reservoir by American <br />Stone. Finally, Nello L. Teer Company will terminate use of the existing asphalt plant located <br />adjacent to the former quarry (reservoir) in May 2000. <br />To obtain the required zoning and special use permit for quarry expansion, the applicants <br />were advised that they would fast have to pursue amendments to the Joint Planning Area Land Use <br />Plan and Land Use Element of the Orange County Comprehensive Plan. Applications JPA-1-91 <br />(expansion of the extractive use category) and CP-3-91 (creation of a rural industrial activity node) <br />were submitted by the applicants and presented at public hearing on October 10, 1991. Concern <br />with potential environmental impacts was raised during the public hearing process. Two particular <br />areas of concern dealt with the proposed relocation oaf the existing asphalt plant (currently located <br />on property 9759-63-9813) -this issue is now moot -and the effects of blasting on surraunding <br />properties. <br />Though not a requirement of the plan amendment process, the applicants chose to prepare and <br />submit an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) as specified in the Orange County Environmental <br />Impact Ordinance. The EIS was presented at a JPA public hearing on October 14, 1993. Between <br />that hearing and the one held on April 14, 1994, the applicants withdrew the proposal for <br />relocating the asphalt plant; they also provided documentation of their efforts to address impacts on <br />surrounding properties. As in the 1994 evaluation of the application, fmdings of the original EIS, <br />and EIS, March 2000 Update will be cited, ,as appropriate in the evaluation of the application. <br />APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS <br />Application requirements for an amendment to the' Orange County Comprehensive Plan are <br />contained in Articles 2 and 20 of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance. Although the proposed <br />amendment referenced as JP-1-00 is to the Joint Planning Area Land Use Plan, it falls within the <br />Rural Buffer area in which provisions of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance are in effect. Thus, <br />JP-1-00 and CP1-00 (amendment to the Orange County Comprehensive Plan) are governed by <br />