Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-11-2000-5c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2000
>
Agenda - 04-11-2000
>
Agenda - 04-11-2000-5c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 3:58:49 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 11:17:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/11/2000
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5c
Document Relationships
Minutes - 04-11-2000
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~a <br />NORTH CAROL]NA HOUSING' STAN CE AGEI~,TCY <br />~. - HOUSING REHA~3ILTTATION PRQGRAMS <br />- A~ Energy Standards - <br />(For the rehabilitation of housing in buildings of ono to four dwelling units) <br />(Effective May 1, 1199 <br /> <br />introduction. ~ There is no doubt about the need to reduce household energy use. Houses <br />accouzit for over one-sixth .of our national energy consumption. We have been exposed to <br />countless facts and figures illustrating the need for and possibility of cutting this fraction in <br />half. We have heard haw many thousands of tons of polluting chemicals and particulates <br />cpuld be avoided, how many do2ens of nucleaz power plants we would not have to build, -how <br />many millions of barrels of foreign oil we would not have to import if all our homes were as <br />energy-eff cient as we know how to make them. <br />And, there is no doubt that our housing rehabilitation prograttis' 'targeted betieficiaries are <br />among the hazdest hit by borne energy casts. Nationally, the poorest 20% of households <br />spend almost 15°!0 of their income for home energy, while the next 40% of Americans spend <br />about d% of income for home energy. Ta those with incomes below half the state's median, <br />to the elderly and disabled on low, fixed incomes, and to single-parent families struggling tv <br />break the cycle of poverty, a saving of even $30 or $40 per month in energy costs is very <br />significant. There is no doubt about that. . <br />However, what is not so cleaz-cut is which specific ,measures should be taken on a given <br />dwelling unit to improve its energy-efficiency, Every house we wank on is unique, and many <br />of them were "homemade" to no set standazds. Plus, the burgeoning field of building science <br />gives us new diagnostic techniques, new sets of priorities and new energy-saving products at <br />such a pace that few can keep up. <br />What follows, then, is an attempt to guide qualified and experienced rehabilitation specialists <br />in providing the most appropriate measures with available funding to save money for low- <br />and moderate-income clientele, and to save energy resources far posterity. <br />• $ackground. The first edition of these standards was developed in 1990 to govern <br />rehabilitation funded by the North Catalina Housing Trust Fund's Rehabilitation Incentive <br />Program. A set of standazds developed by the North Carolina Alternative Energy <br />Corporation (AEC) was used as a guide, as were documents from low-income housing <br />rehabilitation programs in other states. <br />The first edition was reviewed by AEC, the Energy Division (of the North Cazalina <br />Department of Commerce) and the North, Carolina Solar Center. Their comments lead to <br />several important improvements. In developing 'two subsequent editions feedback from many <br />others, including rehabilitation specialists representing Rehabilitation Incentive Program <br />recipient organizations, was responsible for additional improvements. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.