Orange County NC Website
DRAFT <br />escalation of required expenditures for capital and debt would reduce the amount of fiinding for <br />operating expenses, perhaps when it is most needed. <br />14. CHCCS representatives pointed out anticipated budget pressures for next year with 600 more students <br />than were projected for this year (costing $1.5 million more, without covering mandates) and an <br />expectation that the final year implementation of the Excellent Schools Act will require $1.5 million <br />just for salary increases. <br />1 S. There was discussion of what kind of rigorous, non-staff review of operating budgets is done, both for <br />County and schools. CHCCS mentioned the 1995 Pannesi report. 80% of which has been <br />implemented, with the balance waiting on the State to upgrade SIMS. <br />16. There was a suggestion to shoot for the 5-yeaz historical average of just over 48% of the County's <br />General Fund allocated to education as a target. <br />Recommendations to the Board of Commissioners <br />There was universal agreement that the task force process was enlightening and helpful to all parties in <br />gaining a better appreciation of the perspectives and pressures experienced by the others. However, there <br />was no consensus among task farce members that any funding model identified either by the County or <br />the schools should be recommended to the Boazd of Commissioners for implementation. There was <br />mutual recognition that the County is not seeking to impose a hazd cap on school funding, and <br />reaffirmation that it is the responsibility of each school board to determine how best to allocate the <br />operational funds appropriated to each system annually by the Board of Commissioners. <br />The task force discussion focused more on tazgets for school funding, and in the end there was acceptance <br />of the concept that the County Manager should consider various "benchmazks" in developing school <br />current expense funding levels in his recommended annual operating budget. Schools would continue to <br />base their requests on identified needs, and would submit their requests for funding over the previous <br />year's appropriation with annotation of the school boards' priorities. There would continue to be an <br />opportunity for each school board to present to the Board of Commissioners any concerns left <br />unaddressed, in their view, by the Manager's school funding recommendations. <br />In reviewing and approving the overall County budget, the Board of Commissioners would likewise <br />consider benchmarks related to school funding. These benchmarks could include: <br />^ 10 year historical figures of school funding on a per pupil basis; <br />^ 10 year historical figures on average annual increase in total school funding; <br />^ 10 yeaz historical figures of total school funding as a percentage of the County's General Fund; <br />^ 10 yeaz historical figures of school funding by major component (current expense, long-term <br />capital, recurring capital, and debt service); <br />^ 10 year historical figures on average annual increase in current expense funding; <br />^ relative position of grange County in school funding per pupil compared to other North Carolina <br />jurisdictions <br />• total effort (actual dollazs per pupil -for 1999-2000, this is $3,755 in Orange County vs. <br />$2,747 in the 2"d ranked county, Mecklenburg); <br />