Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-29-2000-3
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2000
>
Agenda - 03-29-2000
>
Agenda - 03-29-2000-3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 5:16:34 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 11:16:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/29/2000
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
3
Document Relationships
Minutes - 03-29-2000
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
33 <br />billed an advice from the county attorney. Na remedies for delinquencies and non- <br />payments are being used, also based on the attorney's advice. <br />Man er's Method -The manager has suggested the use of the annual tax mailings <br />as a vehicle far billing and collecting the fees. According to him, this is similar to <br />billings from other county agencies an the tax bill, While all the remedies for <br />collection of delinquent taxes would not apply if the fees ga unpaid in this setup, <br />the collection rate would probably be much higher than it now is and current <br />remedies far non-payment would not be lost. This method would be applied to <br />both the `der inspection" and the annual "operations permit" options. <br />1F~inanciaY Security <br />'The final aspect of the expansion proposal discussed by the committee was the <br />financial security far repair of septic systems when they fail. The types of security <br />requirements discussed were bonding,~revolving funds, escrow accounts, up front <br />replacement money, initial dual drainfield installation, and slow interest/no <br />interest capital reserve fund coining Pram fee augmentation, <br />The committee reached no agreement on whether a security plan was necessary for <br />all systems, which method would be better or how any plan, would be <br />implemented. There was general agreement that larger and higher risk systems <br />should be under some sort of security plan for eventual repairs and that lower <br />income citizens should have access to grants or low interest loans for system <br />replacement. The county attorney will also provide guidance on this matter before <br />the plans are finalized. <br />~...~.. ~ n _ r ~ ., <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.