Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-29-2000-3
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2000
>
Agenda - 03-29-2000
>
Agenda - 03-29-2000-3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 5:16:34 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 11:16:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/29/2000
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
3
Document Relationships
Minutes - 03-29-2000
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
31 <br />FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS <br />Costs ~ . <br />When the existing WIMP proposal was preseIIt~, ~ the late 1980's; David M. <br />Griffith and Associates conducted the study to establish tlie fee level and other <br />related financial considerations. The fees approved for the implementation of the <br />program were approximately one-half of the DMG recommendation and one FTE <br />was fimded to start the work At present, the direct fees account for approximately <br />one fourth of the FTE salary costs and the percentage of fee reimbursement <br />gradually increases each year. Because the DMG methodology was based <br />Primarily on direct costs, staff doe§n't believe it to be the best way to approach the <br />estimation of costs fvr the expansion. <br />The Institute of Government is conducting a study of the costs for environmental <br />health services ~in several counties across North Carolina'which is based on a more <br />comprehensive cost allocation model. The first draft of this study is due out soon <br />and should offer a more accurate way to look at the actual costs of providing <br />education and inspections. When finalized and if fees are part of the funding <br />mechanism, staff will prepare a fee schedule for the committee's review based on <br />the IOG methodology and findings. CIP needs such as computers, technical <br />equipment and vehicles will also be figured. into the fee base. <br />The direct costs for each inspector will be salary and. fringes, vehicle, computer <br />equipment, field equipment, and office finniture. <br />Funding - <br />There are several options for paying for this program expansion. It is staff's <br />recommendation that the option selected also be used to fund the existing W'I'MP <br />activities. <br />General Fund -The general fiord is the first option for covering the expenses of <br />this program, The principal argument against using the general fund is that <br />municipal citizens would be paying for inspection of county resident's septic <br />systems.- However, it must be considered that the watersheds for the three main <br />impoundments (and a proposal, fourth) serving the Towns of Carrboro, Chapel Hill <br />and Hillsborough are mostly comprised of county lands served by on-site septic <br />systems. This expansion will be a benefit in the protection of those reservoirs. <br />The general fund approach would also eliminate take the "ability to pay" and non- <br />payment issues and be much easier to administer from the Health <br />pave. Department's <br />S ecial Fund -- Although a special fund, even an enterprise fund, could be <br />considered, there was not much support for its use with the committee. This <br />method would allow for the charging of a monthly fee to each enrolled owner for <br />._ _-- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.