Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-14-2000-9a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2000
>
Agenda - 03-14-2000
>
Agenda - 03-14-2000-9a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 6:37:27 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 11:16:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/14/2000
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9a
Document Relationships
2000 S County Mgr - Interlocal agreement for solid waste matters Greene Tract
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\General Contracts and Agreements\2000's\2000
Minutes - 03-14-2000
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORANGE COUNTY <br />ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCE CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT <br />MEMORANDUM <br />To: John Link, County Manager <br />From: David Stancil, Environment and Resource Conservation Director <br />Craig Benedict, Planning Director <br />Date: March 9, 2000 <br />Re: Review of the Greene Tract for Potential Uses <br />To follow-up on the Board of Commissioners discussion of the Greene tract biological and <br />cultural resource surveys last week, we have prepared a quick analysis of the Greene tract for <br />three different categories of uses to see which 60 acre portions of the property might be most <br />appropriate. <br />It is important to note fhat the Bio%gica/Resources Survey for fhe properfy remains <br />income/ete, with no further information avai/ab/e at this Time. Staff s evaluation is <br />based on the incomplete evaluation and the best available resource information in our database. <br />General Implications of Survey Results to Date <br />While one of the surveys remains incomplete at this time, it is apparent that there are two <br />primary implications that can be drawn: <br />1. The cultural survey has identified two sites that may qualify for the National Register of <br />Historic Places. Any land disturbing or human activities should attempt to avoid these sites <br />and their immediate environs, for possible future archaeological work. (These sites are <br />shown on the map in a circular area identified with an "H'~. <br />2. The biological resource survey appears to indicate that the mesic oak (i.e., dry or uplands <br />oak) and mixed hardwood forest in the northern portion of the Greene tract is more likely to <br />host the greater variety of species, and as such might be seen as the most significant <br />biological resource on site. The potential wetlands and mixed hardwood forest in the <br />southeastern portion of the site are also worthy of note. <br />With these primary implications in the mind, the following sections summarize in a general way <br />where the "best" or most appropriate 60-acres on this property might be for three categories of <br />potential land uses. It should be noted that this is a cursory review, and that amore-definitive <br />analysis would require a more detailed and in-depth assessment of the property. In some cases, <br />the sectors of the site that are identified do not equal 60 acres. We have completed the <br />assessment with an idea for a conceptual plan that might accommodate all of these uses on the <br />Greene tract. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.