Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />�15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />N <br />Procedures; (h) Section III- D -1 -g, Action Subsequent to Approval; <br />(i) Section III- D -1 -h, Appeal Procedures; <br />0) Section III -D -2 -d (Concept Plan Approval in the Rural Buffer) <br />Planning Department Review Procedures; <br />(k) Section III- D -2 -c, Planning Board Review and Approval Procedures; <br />(1) Section III- D -2 -d, Action Subsequent to Approval; <br />(m) Section III- 0-2 -e, Appeal Procedures; <br />(n) Section III -D -3 -b (Preliminary Plat Approval) Planning Department <br />Review Procedures; <br />(o) Section III-D-3-c, Planning Board Review and Approval Procedures; <br />(p) Section III- D -3 -d, Board of Commissioners Review and Approval <br />Procedures; <br />(q) Section III -D-4 -b (Final Plat Approval) Review and Approval <br />Procedures; <br />(r) Section III-D-5, Appeal Procedures; <br />(3) Section VII -D-4 (Legal Status Provisions) Amendment Procedures,, <br />Action Subsequent to the Date of Public Hearing. <br />(4) Staff Presentations: <br />Planning Director Craig Benedict made introductory remarks. <br />Planner Robert Davis made the presentation of the proposed text amendments. The objectives of the <br />proposed review time changes were presented as benefits each entity: <br />Board of County Commissioners, Objectives: <br />• ANALYSIS - Allows thorough analysis of proposals without default approvals. <br />• CERTAIN MINOR SUBDIVISIONS - Discourages developers from seeking,minor subdivision approval <br />in order to avoid major subdivision requirements. <br />- LESS CONTROVERSY - Increases probability that recommendations will reach Commissioners <br />without major controversy. <br />Planning Board Objectives: <br />• IMPROVES Planing Board /County Commissioners <br />• CONSENSUS - Eliminates recommendations going to Board of Commissioners without action or <br />conditions. <br />- APPEALS - Specifies time limitations for filing appeals of Planning Department decisions to Board of <br />Adjustments. <br />Staff Objectives: <br />- COORDINATION - Allows all affected agencies sufficient time to review and work with applicants to <br />reach agreement on specific topics. <br />- DEFAULT APPROVALS - Eliminates default approvals on subdivisions where agencies have yet to <br />reach accord with developer on specific topics. <br />- DEADLINES - Sets deadline for Informational Meetings in order to allow sufficient time to prepare a <br />concise staff report on proposals. <br />• MINOR VS MAJOR - Amends classification process to require major subdivision review in cases of <br />disagreement between staff and developers. <br />County Attorney Geoffrey Gledhill made comments about the preliminary <br />plat. Planner Davis continued, speaking as to the concept of appeal. Attorney Gledhill stated there was <br />no time limitation for appeal. <br />(5) . Questions from the Board of County Commissioners: <br />