Orange County NC Website
<br /> <br />ORANGE COUNTY <br />ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCE CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT <br />MEMORANDUM <br />T0: Rod Visser, Assistant County Manager <br />From: David Stancil~'Environment and Resource Conservation Direct r <br />o <br />Date: February 23, 2000 <br />Re: Initial Review of Greene Tract Reports <br />Please find attached quick and informal reviews of the archaeological report <br />(completed) and the biological resources report (incomplete) from our staff. <br />Archaeological_Re~ort <br />In general, our findings are that the important archaeological sites on the Greene <br />tract appear to lie south of the proposed 60-acre boundary line (as we know it <br />from maps in the Planning Department). There are two potential National <br />Register historic sites on the property, but both are south of the northern 60- <br />acre portion (although one, the Byrd House, is close to the line). A Phase II level <br />of investigation for these sites will likely be warranted before anything is <br />disturbed on the remaining 109-acre part of the site. There are several other <br />possible prehistoric or "isolated find" sites that do not appear to warrant further <br />investigation at this time. <br />Biological Resources Survey <br />Because the biological survey is incomplete, it is difficult to assess the <br />implications of this report. However, the consultant has identified that there is <br />suitable habitat for five protected animal species and one protected plant <br />species. They have not as yet identified whether these species in fact exist on <br />the property, however. Until further work is done, it is impossible to say whether <br />this finding will relate the northern 60-acre portion. There does appear to be <br />more of amixed-hardwood forest (which tends to harbor more species diversity) <br />on the northern and southeastern parts of the Greene tract. <br />Many important sections of the biological report are not complete, and we will <br />not be able to fully assess the biological component until the consultant provides <br />more information (in particular, amore-detailed site visit). Please let me know if <br />you have any questions. I have attached one-page summary reviews from Tina <br />Moon (archaeological) and Rich Shaw (biological). <br />