Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-29-2000-9a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2000
>
Agenda - 02-29-2000
>
Agenda - 02-29-2000-9a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 2:06:47 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 11:16:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/29/2000
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 02-29-2000
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />ORANGE COUNTY <br />ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCE CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT <br />MEMORANDUM <br />T0: Rod Visser, Assistant County Manager <br />From: David Stancil~'Environment and Resource Conservation Direct r <br />o <br />Date: February 23, 2000 <br />Re: Initial Review of Greene Tract Reports <br />Please find attached quick and informal reviews of the archaeological report <br />(completed) and the biological resources report (incomplete) from our staff. <br />Archaeological_Re~ort <br />In general, our findings are that the important archaeological sites on the Greene <br />tract appear to lie south of the proposed 60-acre boundary line (as we know it <br />from maps in the Planning Department). There are two potential National <br />Register historic sites on the property, but both are south of the northern 60- <br />acre portion (although one, the Byrd House, is close to the line). A Phase II level <br />of investigation for these sites will likely be warranted before anything is <br />disturbed on the remaining 109-acre part of the site. There are several other <br />possible prehistoric or "isolated find" sites that do not appear to warrant further <br />investigation at this time. <br />Biological Resources Survey <br />Because the biological survey is incomplete, it is difficult to assess the <br />implications of this report. However, the consultant has identified that there is <br />suitable habitat for five protected animal species and one protected plant <br />species. They have not as yet identified whether these species in fact exist on <br />the property, however. Until further work is done, it is impossible to say whether <br />this finding will relate the northern 60-acre portion. There does appear to be <br />more of amixed-hardwood forest (which tends to harbor more species diversity) <br />on the northern and southeastern parts of the Greene tract. <br />Many important sections of the biological report are not complete, and we will <br />not be able to fully assess the biological component until the consultant provides <br />more information (in particular, amore-detailed site visit). Please let me know if <br />you have any questions. I have attached one-page summary reviews from Tina <br />Moon (archaeological) and Rich Shaw (biological). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.