Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-01-2000 - 9d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2000
>
Agenda - 02-01-2000
>
Agenda - 02-01-2000 - 9d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/1/2008 10:51:49 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 11:15:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/1/2000
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9d
Document Relationships
Minutes - 02-01-2000
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2000
Minutes - 02-01-2000
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 <br />NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING <br />ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br />A public hearing will be held in the Judge F. Gordon Battle Superior Courtroom of the New <br />Orange County Courthouse, 106 E. Margaret Lane, Hillsborough, North Carolina, on Monday, <br />February 28, 2000, at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of giving all interested citizens an opportunity to <br />speak for or against the following items: <br />A. ORANGE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS <br />1. Upper Eno Watershed Density Amendments <br />a. Amend SECTION 6.23 EXTRA REQUIREMENTS FOR <br />WATERSHED PROTECTION OVERLAY DISTRICTS to lower the <br />permitted densities in a portion the Upper Eno Protected Watershed <br />Area and Upper Eno Critical Area. <br />b. Amend SECTION 6.23.2 RESIDENTIAL DENSITY to revise the <br />maximum density allowed in a portion of the Protected Area and the <br />Critical Area. The proposal would change current regulations to the <br />2-acre and 5-acre density that currently exists in the University Lake <br />Watershed and the Cane Creek Watershed. The proposed changes <br />would not apply to any portion of the 1-85/Buckhorn Road Economic <br />Development District (EDD),- nor to the Rural Residential, transition <br />area south of Interstate 40/85 adjacent to the 1-85/Buckhorn Road <br />EDD, nor to Rural Residential, transition area south of High Rock <br />Road and Lebanon Road as defined in the Land Use Element of the <br />Orange County Comprehensive Plan. <br />c: Amend SECTION 6.23.3c.1 Residential Development IMPERVIOUS <br />SURFACE/DETENTION POND REQUIREMENTS RESIDENTIAL <br />for a portion of the Protected Area and Critical Area. The proposed <br />changes would not apply to any portion of the 1-85/Buckhorn Road <br />Economic Development District (EDD), nor to the Rural Residential, <br />transition area south of Interstate 40/85 adjacent to the I- <br />85/Buckhorn Road EDD, nor to Rural Residential, transition area <br />south of High Rock Road and Lebanon Road as defined in the Land <br />Use Element of the Orange County Comprehensive Plan. <br />d. Amend SECTION 6.23.3C.2 Non-Residential Development <br />IMPERVIOUS SURFACE/DETENTION POND REQUIREMENTS <br />(NON-RESIDENTIAL) for a portion of the Protected Area and Critical <br />Area. The proposed changes would not apply to any portion of the I- <br />85/Buckhorn Road Economic Development District (EDD), nor to the <br />Rural Residential, transition area south of Interstate 40/85 adjacent <br />to the 1-85/Buckhorn Road EDD, nor to Rural Residential, transition <br />area south of High Rock Road and Lebanon Road as defined in the <br />Land Use Element of the Orange County Comprehensive Plan. <br />... /rr.hc r+/1-i-A/rl,PFlrn-
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.