Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-01-2000 - 10b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2000
>
Agenda - 02-01-2000
>
Agenda - 02-01-2000 - 10b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2010 3:59:18 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 11:15:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/1/2000
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
0b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 02-01-2000
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2000
Minutes - 02-01-2000
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
31 <br />CONSIDERATIONS <br />When the aoisdng W'rW proposal was presented in the late 19$0's, David M. <br />Griffith and Associates conducted the study to establish the fee level and other <br />related financial considerations. The fees approved for the implementation of the <br />program wen approxumately one-half of the DMG recommendation and one FTE <br />was fimded to start the work At present, the direct fees account far approximately <br />one fourth of the FTE salary costs and the percentage of fee reimbursement <br />gradmIly increases each year. Because the DMG methodology was based <br />Ply on direct costs, staff doesn't believe it to be the best way to approach the <br />6timatian of costs for the expansion. <br />The bsOtM of Government is conducting a study of the costs fir <br />health services -m several counties across North Carolina which is based on a mare <br />comprehensive cost allocation model. The first draft of this study is due out soon <br />and shd offer a more accurate way to look at the actual costs of providing <br />education and moons. When fmalized and if fees are part of the finding <br />mechanism, staff will prepare a fee schedule for the committee's review based on <br />the I06methodology and findings. ClP needs such as computers, technical <br />eTnpm t and vehicles will also be figured into the fee base. <br />The direct casts for each inspector will be salary and fides, vehicle, computer <br />equipnxi it, field equipment, and office finaium <br />Funding -- <br />Theere are several options for paying for this program expansion. It is staf ns <br />recommendation that the option selected also be used to fimd the existing wnm p <br />VZMAW fund - The general fiord is the first option for covering the expenses of <br />this PlOi? - The FmciPd argument against using the general fiord is that <br />would be payin <br />g for inspection of c?mty resident's septic <br />it must be considered that the watersheds for the three main <br />=M?=, <br />mftents (and a proposed fourth) serving the Towns of Carr 3wo, Chapel Hill <br />and Hiillsbm- ugh are mostly comprised of county lands served by an-site septic <br />systems. This expansion will be a benefit in the protection of those reservoirs. <br />The general fiord approach would also eliminate take the "ability to pay" and non <br />Payment issues and be much easier to administer from the Health Department's <br />S ecial EWd - Although a special fund, even an enterprise fimd, could be <br />cMWW6 =wo here wa s not much support for its use with the committee. This <br />methd allow for the charging of a monthly fee to each enrolled owner for <br />n-- .1 f% _r'1 .n
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.