Orange County NC Website
ORANGE COUNTY <br />BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br />ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br />Meeting Date: November 19, 2002 <br />Action Agen a <br />Item No. - <br />SUBJECT• 2001-2002 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) <br />DEPARTMENT: Finance PUBLIC HEARING: (YIN) No <br />ATTACHMENT(S): <br />CAFR and Single Audit Reports <br />(Under Separate Cover) <br />INFORMATION CONTACT: <br />Ken Chavious, ext. 2453 <br />TELEPHONE NUMBERS: <br />Hillsborough 732-8181 <br />Chapel Hill 968-4501 <br />Durham 688-7331 <br />Mebane 336-227-2031 <br />PURPOSE: To receive the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) and Single Audit <br />Report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002. <br />BACKGROUND: The CAFR covers all financial activity of the County for the 2001-2002 fiscal <br />year and the Single Audit Report focuses on grant compliance for the same fiscal year. Both <br />reports result from an annual audit of the County's financial records, which occurred during the <br />past several months. The audit was performed by Cherry Bekaert & Holland, the firm of <br />independent Certified Public Accountants hired by the Board last fiscal year. Presentation of <br />these reports is necessary in order to fulfill the requirements set forth in Chapter 159-34 of the <br />North Carolina General Statutes. <br />The results of the 2002 audit were very good. 2002 marked the first year implementation of <br />Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) statement 34. This new pronouncement <br />by GASB dramatically changes the financial statement presentation to make the traditional <br />government statements read more like those of private industry. With the assistance of the <br />auditors, the implementation was very successful. The Finance Director will discuss the major <br />impacts and changes to the financial statements resulting from GASB 34 in more detail during <br />the presentation. Undesignated fund balance in the general fund at year-end was 10% of <br />general fund expenditures. This amount exceeds the Local Government Commission's <br />recommended minimum of 8%. This percentage is less than prior year levels due to economic <br />and state budgetary impacts. The County's ability to absorb those impacts and remain above <br />the 8% minimum reflects the commitment on the part of management and the Board to insure <br />that fund balance levels are sufficient to address unforeseen circumstances. <br />The auditors found no instances of material weakness in the County's internal control structure <br />and have issued an "unqualified" (good) opinion on the County's financial statements. In fact, <br />there were no material audit findings related to the audit of the CAFR or the single audit. The <br />auditors did, however, make some minor recommendations. These recommendations along <br />