Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-11-2002-5
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2002
>
Agenda - 11-11-2002
>
Agenda - 11-11-2002-5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 12:42:58 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 11:13:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/11/2002
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20021111
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ao <br />• Total estimated construction casts over 30 years for Orange County School Dis4ict <br />Is therefore $128,951,280. <br />• Total estimated construction mats over 30 years for Chapel HiIllCartboro School <br />District is therefore $ $218512,405. <br />• Total estimatetl construction costs over 30 years to meet etlumtional facility needs <br />Is therefore $338,483,686. <br />Fudher, the County is facing signifimnt mnstmcMion nestle of its own through rts <br />stetutodly requlretl support of court system facilities. Preliminary estimates equate the <br />cost of the judicial facilities (without tail mnsWCtion) with those of a new elementary <br />school. <br />This brings [he total potential3o-year consWCtign outlay for education and judicial <br />facilities to approximately $ 352,249,1 ]0. <br />Projectetl costs of this magnitude create a considerable challenge fo ensure that <br />consWC[ion and major renovation projects funded by the County are properly designed to <br />meet both County and Schml nestle within available resources. <br />In atltlition, with the advent of the School Adequate Public Facilities Ortlinance (SAPFO), <br />now in tlevelppment, the fiscal issues will tlemantl greater adention. As you may know, <br />the SAPFO will, among other things: <br />Degne a level of service capacity, which each new school will be expectetl to <br />meet. For example, iP'X"number of units are approved for tlevelopment within <br />the County, then "V" type of stlrool (elementary, middle, high school)whh "Z" <br />capacity must be built wthin the next "N' number of years; antl <br />The SAPFO will allow schmis to operate marginally over-capacity for onlya <br />limited period of time, thereby creating the necessity for school mnstmctlon to <br />be considered in a timely manner. <br />Apofentlal solunon~ <br />This look to the horizon tells us that the limited package of footling resources available [o <br />supped construction initiatives will not be sufficient to meet tlemantl withoN very careful <br />planning. Ratherthanto immediately raise thefuMing bar, and potentially the tax role, it <br />is pendent [o consitler cos[ efficiency measures that will provide functionally excellent <br />hcilities at a manageable cost. <br />In the Spring/Summer 1999 the Bcartl mnsitleretl a value engineering option for County <br />antl school projects, in which each faulity woultl be subject to a value engineering process <br />in tandem whh its design. This approach proved tq be unsuitable, particularly for upcoming <br />school constmctlon projects, from a cost antl timing point of view. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.