Agenda - 11-11-2002-5 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

i~ The roofing smntlam for buildings will be metal (unless proM1lGl[etl ae may be the In hialOhc districts); or Aspeeific eneryy emelancy level(BN COnsumptlon per square foot)must be achieved by Ole HVAC system pmposeQ or To avoid Poture maintenance mmplimtlons, systems, such as wa[erlgas service or wiring receways, shall not be embedded in the cpncfete Ooor slab unless code restriClions prObihl cVPlheatl bsla3110ns. Upon wmpletioM1 tM1e resulting standards woultl be taken by the mmmidee members M their respecllYe governing boards far comment. ultimately, tM1e 80ard of Commissioners would adopt the stantlaN by which may would tuna capital projects. StandaMS woultl ba provided to any firm retained by IM1e county or the Btllools to design a facility. The frm would be expelled to design incompliance with the tlasign guidelines. Upon mmpletibn o(a facility design, Me designer woultl provide certifratlon tp [M1e School antl the County that the tlasign guidelines hetl been met er cite areas where deviations were mandated by a regulatory hotly. TM1e County Engineering stag would ew the blNmnsWtllon documents and the ceNfirelions and render an opinion on tbelsuficiency or mmpliance tlocumantation. In regard to seM1OOI projects, if a School Board determines that exweding a stantlaN is uitiral tO IM1e Nobility o(a given pfIX]ram, Men the ScM1OaI BoaN may submit a proposal to pay br adtlXimal costs from Olberoay-as-you-go funds available to Me School, eg. recurring cepltal. wndme: Recommendations (or tirnding ofcepilal pmjcets rettwut as endorsedby the Boerdm June 1999. 1'hc mvccpl is ae follows: While the Board will covtlnpeto epmove theprojems iv Ma COmty's tcv-year C]P, approval ofspmFficpmjml component will omur afitt costs have been firmly estabtiehed bybid, a cnntrwt, yr vtherldghly reliable cost de[ormitirtg morns for each ompweN OCprojcot develnpmrnt. Bssmlially, Ma appropnatiov world be equivnlrnt ~o Mamrornl afmowy wady ro ne snort rm anmticwar ergept mmponont mnetiop <plaaaiap, flte aaxampmmt mmworpa, Ne) Capiml Policy reWsiovs m reflect thin are irmrdrtrnt. .1s nvled w We lone action, Mis proccee will involve vdditivnal steps vs the Board is called noon tnteke artiov at nations milastonev in Mo pryce[, mtMrtban vllocvtingalump sam Loi each project whey the C~ is approved. I Ioweveq Nis moms of aPPronrie4nR Cur capital nrole¢s appcam Mprovide the Comtry mvsidenMly more flexibility iv resoomsmerta6emrnt. Sivm appmpnutions would be madc by projml component and would M1e bored uv mom accm&e cost data my surylns from the total prvjwt would rutww available for vppmpnativn w Culurc C1P projects. 6eneOls: We believe this aDproacM1 promMes greater consistency in systems and doesa better jab of analyzing systems before they are spec~ietl for use In a builEing. • Mater Ome and cpatmmmiMan6 oauronetime. As future refinements of Me standards became necessary, Mey sM1OUkI be manageable and could possibly be accomplishes Mrougn collaboration of School antl County stall.