Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-30-2002 - 1 (AOG)
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2002
>
Agenda - 10-30-2002
>
Agenda - 10-30-2002 - 1 (AOG)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2017 11:18:15 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 11:12:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/30/2002
Meeting Type
Assembly of Government
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20021030
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Gwen Harvey-Orange County Forum Feedback.doc Page 2 <br /> r <br /> II. DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY SERVICES (Priorities shown by#of votes in <br /> parentheses) <br /> The Ideal Developmental Disability Service System <br /> • Work , Live, Play, Retire in our community (5) <br /> • Increased Respite Services (4) <br /> • Increased spectrum of housing (group homes, co-housing, apartments) (6) <br /> • Greater communication with OPC and schools (1) <br /> • Flexible money and authority of person with DD over the money; services not tied to funding <br /> source (3) <br /> • Independent and not be hungry at end of the month (1) <br /> • Language user friendly—what is target pop? (3) <br /> • No waiting lists (2) <br /> • More professional ized staff—less reliance on for-profit providers (1) <br /> • Well qualified advocacy and CM so consumers and families know what is available (1) <br /> • More meaningful day treatment programs (2) <br /> • Not to be excluded by diagnosis or lack there of (3) <br /> • Transportation—Easy rider is overwhelmed (5) <br /> • Examine Medicaid eligibility requirements - if move from facility lose benefits (1) <br /> • Case management flexibility (2) <br /> • Support brokerage available (1) <br /> • Self determination (4) <br /> • Who is advising on high importance items–county commissioners (1) <br /> • LME needs to be a key advisor ( (1) <br /> • Active consumer and family advisory Committee (1) <br /> • Plan to serve aging consumers with DD (1) <br /> • Continue to have input from the public and interested individuals (2) <br /> • More Medicaid providers (1) <br /> • Funding for socialization training programs (2) <br /> • Support for families dealing with consumers with DD (2) <br /> • Day services–need an array of options (2) <br /> • Accountability for following through on what works–utilize the methods that work and use <br /> outcomes–clarify/define accountability–recognize the experts (1){rEACCH) <br /> • For low incidence disabilities draw from other counties/resources for support/service/training <br /> and people (1) <br /> • Voc Rehab–doesn't work-fix it. VR won't open case without identified long term SE <br /> funding (1) <br /> • Long term support for folks who want to work (2) <br /> • Crisis Services for folks with DD (3) <br /> • Education of hospital regarding crisis service for individual with DD–Autism (2) <br /> • Good system of medical providers trained to work with DD consumers (3) <br /> • Deinstitutionalization (1) <br /> • Self-advocacy (1) <br /> • Coordination/education with legal system and law enforcement (1) <br /> • Don't take money out of system, keep in system with deinstitutionalization (2) <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.