Orange County NC Website
15 <br /> we also know that this issue has not been officially addressed. We hope Alamance County and Orange <br /> County will take a lead role to address these issues. <br /> Chair Jacobs: Thank you, and we have had a similar conversation with Alamance County <br /> Commissioners as we've had with all the other entities here and we hope to be working with them on that <br /> issue along with the issue of our disputed boundary with Alamance County in the near future. <br /> At this time, I'll ask Don Cox, who introduced himself and his dual roles in Orange County, to give <br /> us a presentation on the groundwater perspective, and then we'll take our break. When we come back, Pat <br /> Davis from Triangle J will give us a regional overview, and then Dr. Moreau will moderate our discussion. <br /> 3. ORANGE COUNTY GROUNDWATER PERSPECTIVE— Don Cox <br /> With about 40% of our population depending on groundwater, the County Commissioners recognized <br /> that our comprehensive land use plan should address the protection of groundwater. In the fall of 1991, the <br /> County Engineer, Paul Thames, called me to ask me to participate and chair a new water resources <br /> committee. At the moment I was on the phone with him, I was watching a well-drilling rig renovating an <br /> improperly constructed well at my house. So I bought into this groundwater resources program pretty heavily <br /> then. We submitted the committee's final report last year. The considerations of the recommendations of our <br /> report for inclusion in the County land use plan are just now beginning. This study was a cooperative effort <br /> with the U. S. Geological Survey. They cost shared 50% with us and there were three main topics—the <br /> threats to groundwater, quantity of groundwater, and the quality of our groundwater resources. To determine <br /> the present and future threats to groundwater, the majority of the existing wells in the County were located by <br /> GPS systems, and all new wells that are being constructed are being located at that time, and we're updating <br /> our database and records whenever that happens. That will let us know where the wells are in the County. <br /> And all identified underground storage tanks, landfills, and any other identifiable threat locations are also in <br /> that database and will be kept up to date. So if there is a spill of some kind, we'll know which location, we'll <br /> know how many wells and what their proximity are to it, and hopefully that database will serve us well in the <br /> future. We also emphasize and do continue to emphasize the importance of following the State guidelines <br /> and sealing, or filling, abandoned or unused wells to avoid their becoming a conduit for groundwater <br /> contamination. This needs to be an ongoing effort and some landowners may need financial assistance to <br /> comply. <br /> With regard to the quantity of groundwater, a study done by using stream gauge measurements to <br /> determine stream base flows of groundwater to surface streams, soils maps, geologic structures, typography, <br /> and land use, or estimates of groundwater yields and the recharge area requirements were made for all sub- <br /> basins in the County. From this, the average groundwater yields and recharge areas needed can be <br /> estimated. The groundwater quality study sampled numerous wells across the County. These wells were <br /> located in all major hydro-geologic formations in every river basin. They were sampled for a wide range of <br /> naturally occurring minerals, manmade chemicals, petroleum residues, and radon gas. As expected, a lot of <br /> the wells showed high iron and manganese and radon in the known granite structures. We found very little <br /> fertilizer, pesticides, and petro-chemical residues in the sample. So at this point in time, as of two or three <br /> years ago, all of the sampling showed excellent water quality. But folks who have higher iron know they have <br /> to deal with that. <br /> A question: Why should the public water service suppliers be concerned about groundwater issues? <br /> Sustainable groundwater resources maintain the base flows to surface streams, which support reservoir <br /> levels and maintain stream water quality and ecology. Perhaps the biggest reason is to avoid the emergency <br /> need to extend public water supplies to areas which have become non-sustaining in groundwater availability <br /> or quality. What can you do to help Orange County and its groundwater sustainability efforts? Your support <br /> for informing the public about the importance of lot sizes and restrictions which preserve the groundwater <br /> resource. These may need to include well head protection, impervious surface limits, undisturbed recharge <br /> area preservation, well replacement locations, septic system drain fields, and reserve drain field areas. <br /> Those are some of the issues. It's not going to be a popular thing to discuss about raising minimum <br /> lot sizes in certain sub-basins in the County. But when you consider the cost of a little bit of additional land <br /> versus 10 or 15 years down the road of having no water at your house, that's an interesting tradeoff. <br /> Chair Jacobs: One of Orange Alamance's practices is to dig large wells. Do we have any <br /> understanding of the relationship between a utility digging a large well and the effect on neighboring smaller <br /> wells that provide service for individual lots? _ <br />