Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-01-2002 - 9a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2002
>
Agenda - 10-01-2002
>
Agenda - 10-01-2002 - 9a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2017 4:23:30 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 11:11:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/1/2002
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20021001
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1!O ATl'ACWKENT 5 <br /> SUIVIlVIARY OF PLANNING BOARD ACTION <br /> Subject: Southern Community Park Conceptual Plan Committee Report-Request for Comments <br /> Meeting Date: February 5, 2002 <br /> Recommendation: The Planning Board voted 9-0 to recommend support of the Conceptual Plan <br /> Committee Plan with specific support of the dog park location away from other activities and with <br /> removal of the restroom facility at the dog park location. The Board also agreed to forward the <br /> individual member comments (see below). <br /> Vote: 9 -0 <br /> Aye: John Hawkins, Scott Radway, Julie Coleman, Coleman Day, Gay Eddy, Nancy Gabriel, <br /> Sally Greene, Bob Reda, Ruby Sinreich <br /> Individual Comments: <br /> 1) Concern was expressed about the extent of clearing of trees for the Frisbee golf area. <br /> 2) The amphitheatre is a good idea. <br /> 3) Concern was expressed about the amount of parking proposed. <br /> 4) Concern was expressed about Dogwood Acres Drive dividing the park. Questions were <br /> asked about traffic calming and speed limit enforcement. <br /> 5) Small picnic shelter areas better than one big picnic area. <br /> 6) How will Southern Village residents arrive at the park on foot? Will trails be provided? <br /> What pedestrian connections are proposed to connect the school to the park? <br /> 7) Prisbee Golf does not interact well with pedestrians. Frisbee Golf may be a "want" not a <br /> "need." <br /> 8) Who will maintain Dogwood Acres Drive? <br /> 9) Why are roller hockey facilities so expensive? <br /> 10) Objection was voiced lo the Town providing dog parks. <br /> 11) A concern was expressed about the cost of utility extension for sewer to proposed bathrooms. <br /> It was noted that a bathroom at the proposed dog park may be expensive and unnecessary. <br /> 12) A concern was expressed that performance space downtown doesn't get touch use. Why is it <br /> proposed here? <br /> 13) The water play area may be an issue during water conservation periods. <br /> 14) The proposal does a good job of balancing the steeds of a diverse population. <br /> 15) Maintain buffer area between the athletic fields and the highway. <br /> 16) Impressive plan and impressive process to develop it. -good community participationlinput. <br /> 17) If the athletic fields are multi-purpose then a,suggestion was made to not call them soccer <br /> fields. <br /> Prepared by: John Hawkins, Chapel Hill Planning Board <br /> J.B. Culpepper, Staff <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.