Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-01-2002-10a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2002
>
Agenda - 10-01-2002
>
Agenda - 10-01-2002-10a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2017 4:35:31 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 11:07:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/1/2002
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
10a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20021001
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
September 23,2002 <br /> Dr.Summers <br /> Page 1 <br /> September 23,2002 <br /> Rosemary L. Summers,MPH,DrPH ; <br /> Health Director <br /> Orange County Health Department <br /> P.O.Box 8181,300 W.Tryon St. <br /> Hillsborough,NC 27278 <br /> Dear Dr. Summers, <br /> i <br /> We are providing comments as requested on infectious disease control at the Orange County <br /> Shelter,based on a visit to the facilities and discussion with you and key shelter staff on <br /> September 17,2002.There are at least two caveats to the comments that follow.First,although <br /> biosecurity issues are an important part of our jobs,each of us has limited experience with shelter <br /> practice. Second,these comments are based on our impressions of the facility,combined with <br /> information provided by the staff.We did not see or review written standard operating <br /> procedures,or any reports or records from previous disease outbreaks.For both reasons,our <br /> comments should be taken as neither a criticism nor endorsement of previous practices. <br /> The facility was uniformly clean and tidy,and animals appeared to be well cared for.It was <br /> apparent that shelter staff invest a great deal of effort in sanitation.This level,of commitment can <br /> make up for many physical plant deficiencies,but limitations in the physical plant can <br /> compromise the ability to control spread of infectious disease. <br /> • Limitations in overall size of the facility can compromise objectives of the shelter in general,but <br /> inevitable pressures for animal housing space can make infectious disease control difficult. <br /> The ideal would be to have adequate quarantine space for all incoming animals,preferably <br /> multiple rooms that would avoid introducing new arrivals to rooms with other animals.A <br /> related logistic issue of course is how long any given animal can be held before being offered <br /> for adoption.Here again,the ideal,from an infectious diseases standpoint,might be to hold a <br /> quarantine room for a week+before any public contact. <br /> • Lay-out/traffic patterns—Ideally,the path for an incoming animal would not cross with routine <br /> traffic patterns,and required personnel traffic,staff or public,would not cross between <br /> quarantine or isolation spaces and other rooms.One particular concern at the Shelter was that <br /> drop-off animals were in a room with queens/litters.This exposes the potentially most <br /> vulnerable animals to new arrivals of unknown health status. <br /> • Surface finishes—We observed several situations where existing surface finishes would be <br /> judged at least difficult to effectively sanitize.These include several areas where paint was <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.