Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-23-2002 - 1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2002
>
Agenda - 09-23-2002
>
Agenda - 09-23-2002 - 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/20/2017 3:41:07 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 11:04:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/23/2002
Meeting Type
Schools
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20020923
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APPROVED 9/19102 <br /> b <br /> Steve suggests dealing with high school standards and middle school standards <br /> first. <br /> There was extensive discussion about the suitability or not of the 15-501 <br /> potential high school site—steepness, RCDs, wetlands, etc limit available <br /> acreage to about a 20 acre strip right along 15-501 —Steve thinks they could <br /> handle a 500 student high school there. <br /> Lisa and Steve noted the success of the McDougle campus in providing <br /> flexibility. <br /> Alice noted that CHCCS seems to be comfortable with SLUC recommendations <br /> on SAPFO, but OCS isn't yet. Craig plans to attend an OCS meeting to try to <br /> respond to their questions. Alice said that at the next SLUC meeting on June <br /> 12,they will look at Carrboro and Chapel.Hill concems and conditions, such as <br /> Level of Service issues. They will consider how material can be packaged and <br /> sent out to jurisdictions for action on the actual ordinance. Although the BOCC <br /> wouldn't want to, its possible that SAPFO could be applied first in CHCCS, and <br /> later in the OCS district. <br /> Craig explained that it may indeed be necessary for various goveming boards to <br /> address the SAPFO several times as one jursidiction or another decides it needs <br /> "tweaks" (for example,Carrboro's level of service concerns that adoption not lead <br /> to an immediate moratorium), but that this round-robin approach may be <br /> necessary. <br /> Craig provided an explanation of the concept behind level of service <br /> consideration and.determination. It defers development until CIP can be <br /> matched to provide needed schools. In Cary, they started at 148% LOS because . <br /> they were already at 143% and they didn't want to require an immediate <br /> moratorium. <br /> Keith noted the adverse educational impacts that could result if the percentage of <br /> overcrowding goes up every year under a higher level of service while we're <br /> waiting for the construction of a new school that will provide some relief: <br /> Dana has concems that conversation persists everywhere that maybe a new <br /> middle school isn't needed that soon, even though funded. If you change level of <br /> service standards, that could foster even more of that kind of view that we should <br /> wait to build the school. <br /> John thinks there needs to be good thumbnail projections; citizens must see that <br /> there is agreement about the definition of"overcrowded". There must be great <br /> care on the part of County and school folks to be in tandem when we say <br /> something is overcrowded or not. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.