Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-17-2002 - 9d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2002
>
Agenda - 09-17-2002
>
Agenda - 09-17-2002 - 9d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/20/2017 11:03:28 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 11:03:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/17/2002
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9d
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20020917
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MEMORANDUM _ ct <br /> the section of Dogwood Acres Drive that bisects the Town's property for the purpose of installing <br /> traffic calming devices (see page 20 of the Report). The purpose of such transfer of control would <br /> be to allow the Town to install traffic calming devices that NCDOT would not permit on a State <br /> controlled road, as well as control speed limits and signage, We believe that strong and effective <br /> traffic calming and signage programs should be in place to protect park patrons. ,However, we <br /> believe that further research is necessary prior to selection of the type,number and location of traffic <br /> calming devices and signs. These details would be better addressed in the project's Special Use <br /> Permit phase. <br /> 11. Benches: The Transportation Board recommends that the plan clarify the number of benches <br /> along the proposed trail. <br /> Southern Community Park Conceptual Plan Committee Comments: The Committee agreed that <br /> benches should be a part of the plan. <br /> Staff' Comments: We agree that the conceptual plan should acknowledge the need for benches. <br /> However, we believe the number and location of benches would be a matter best addressed during <br /> preparation of the Special Use Permit application. <br /> 12. Bus Access: The Transportation Board recommended that the plan address bus access to the park <br /> and designate stop locations. <br /> Southern Community Park Conceptual Plan Committee Comments: The Committee agreed that the <br /> plan should address issues related to bus routes and stops. <br /> Staff Continents: We agree that the conceptual plan should better address bus access and identify <br /> potential bus stop locations. The plan was designed to provide easy bus access to both the park and <br /> park and ride lot. However, the plan could be revised to more adequately articulate this beneficial <br /> relationship. We believe that the actual location of the bus stops should be designated during the <br /> Special Use Permit process. <br /> 13. Light Pollution:Light pollution from the park should be minimized, <br /> Staff Comments: We believe that the Committee has done a good job segregating the major light <br /> sources from the nearby residential uses. We anticipate using light fixtures that would minimise <br /> light spillover onto adjacent properties. We believe that this project should meet the 014 Zone <br /> lighting requirements recently imposed on the University for its main campus expansion. <br /> 14. Dog Park Issues: The Planning Board recommended deletion of the restroom facility proposed to <br /> be located adjacent to the dog park. A Community Design Commission member asked whether a <br /> special septic detention area should be designed to handle dog waste run-off from the dog park. A <br /> Planning Board member questioned the need for dog parks. <br /> Southern Community Park Conceptual Plan Committee Comments: The Committee voted to <br /> recommend that the restroom stay in the conceptual plan at least until the feasibility of the facility <br /> can be determined during the Special Use Permit process. They suggested that the idea be dropped <br /> at the Special Use Permit phase if it proves to be impractical. The Committee did not support the <br /> idea of providing a special septic detention area for the dog park. <br /> Staff Comments: We believe that the dog park will generate sufficient use to warrant construction of <br /> a restroom facility. Currently, the single greatest subject of complaint from citizens using park <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.