Orange County NC Website
2 <br /> School (OCS) and County staff discussion, as well as BOCC direction provided during June <br /> 2002 budget work sessions, regarding the following project considerations: <br /> • Funding for a possible addition to the OCS Board of Education building may be <br /> postponed while OCS explores the possibility of relocating central office staff currently <br /> housed at the Hillsborough Elementary campus to other existing space within the district. <br /> That postponement affords the opportunity to accelerate funding for siting and planning <br /> OCS Middle School #3. <br /> Park project funding reflects Board direction in June 2002 to undertake park projects <br /> generally on an `equal footing", with Town park project and timelines maintained as <br /> presented last winter. <br /> Accelerated funding for conservation easements provides for greater flexibility to act as <br /> opportunities present themselves during the coming year. <br /> Senior Center funding allocations provide for initial funding to begin planning and design <br /> for a replacement when the Galleria lease for the Chapel Hill Senior Center expires. <br /> Over the life of the funding plan, both senior center projects will receive equal amounts of <br /> funding from bonds and alternative financing. <br /> At this time, staff proposes to pursue the first piece ($3.475 million) of the nearly $38 million <br /> alternative financing plan with closing by the end of December 2002. That will allow the County <br /> to obtain lower interest rates for that capital financing because of the County s position as "bank <br /> qualified" (having issued less than $10 million in debt in any calendar year). <br /> Staff also proposes to hold off on the first bond sale until March 2003, rather than the <br /> December 2002 - January 2003 timeline first proposed. The later sale date will allow the <br /> County to piggyback the 2001 bond sale with the refinancing of previously refinanced bonds. <br /> Some of the Countys 1988 bonds were refunded in 1993 at interest rates ranging from 4.75% <br /> to 5.1%. Staff proposes to again refund about $26 million of those outstanding bonds, this time <br /> at an all-inclusive cost annual interest rate of about 3.29%. This will result in annual debt <br /> service savings in excess of $120,000, and a total savings over the next eleven years of $1.35 <br /> million. The approach of combining the bond sale and refunding will reduce administrative <br /> costs (e.g. allowing the County to compile, issue, and produce only one Official Statement). <br /> Because of "call" dates established for the 1993 refunded bonds, March 2003 is the earliest <br /> date at which they can be refunded again, to take advantage of the prevailing lower interest <br /> rates. <br /> The Finance Director will briefly review the steps to be taken leading up to these capital <br /> financings, per the calendar prepared by the County's Bond Counsel. <br /> FINANCIAL IMPACT: As was explained during the public information campaign leading up to <br /> the November 2001 bond referenda, the cumulative debt service impacts from the plan for bond <br /> sales and alternative financing could range from 7 to 10 cents on the property tax rate, <br /> depending on size, timing, and prevailing interest rates. Depending on how debt service <br /> payments are structured through the LGC, the debt service impact for the next fiscal year (FY <br /> 2003-04) resulting from the first bond sale and alternative financing could be in the range of 1 to <br /> 2 cents per$100 of assessed valuation. <br /> RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the Board review and amend, as <br /> needed, the list of projects and amounts to be included in the first bond sale and alternative <br /> financing installment, and direct staff to proceed with all necessary steps to effect the <br /> financings, in accordance with the schedule prepared by Bond Counsel. <br />