Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-29-2002 - Agenda
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2002
>
Agenda - 08-29-2002
>
Agenda - 08-29-2002 - Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2017 2:01:36 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:55:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/29/2002
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20020829
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Staff Report for August 29, 2002 <br />Board of County Commissioners Work Session <br />Growth Control Issues <br />ISSUE 1: Identify the details of a proposed moratoria including: size and scale of a large <br />residential project. ' <br />RESPONSE: August 7`h, 2002, the Planning Board agreed to define large development <br />as any subdivision with 20 or mare lots. <br />ISSUE 2: Determine what "pipeline" proposals would be affected. <br />RESPONSE: The Planning Boazd discussed three "pipeline" options at which to stop an <br />existing project: . <br />l .) A subdivision that has been submitted to staff; <br />2.) The project's concept plan has been approved by the Planning Board; <br />3.) A project that has been issued a formal preliminary approval by the BQCC. <br />ISSUE 3: List the steps necessary to produeelimplement alimited growth moratorium or <br />other growth control. <br />RESPONSE: 1. Report to the Orange County Board of County Commissioners of June <br />18, 2002, in response to the Orange County Planning Boazd "Growth Control Letter of <br />May 6, 2002. A moratorium could be enacted in the following time frame. The length of <br />the moratorium would be coordinated with the completion of a utufied development <br />ordinance which would create a special use process far major subdivisions. The Planning <br />Boazd has asked for additional time to process subdivision applications. The <br />comprehensive plan land use element, adequate public facilities ordinance, and ordinance <br />revisions regarding water resource issues would be concurrently researched and <br />implemented to same degree. <br />The shortest regular timeframe for the enactment of a moratorium would be as follows: <br />Request for Legal Ad November 6, 2002 <br />Quarterly Public Hearing November 25, 2002 <br />PlaruYing Board Action December 4, 2002 <br />BOCC Action December 10, 2002 <br />A shorter timeframe if requested could be accomplished by creating a special public <br />hearing at a regular BOCC date. <br />RESPONSE: 2. Unified Development Ordinance Definition <br />A Unified Development Ordinance (TTDO) is a combined land development code that <br />integrates the present planning regulatory system of "free standing" codes of subdivision, zoning, <br />environmental impacts, erosion control, flood management and economic development. <br />The Unified Development Ordinance creates a comprehensive and cross-referenced <br />document, combines various land use controls in a different procedural context. For example, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.