Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-26-2002 - Agenda
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2002
>
Agenda - 08-26-2002
>
Agenda - 08-26-2002 - Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 4:16:06 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:54:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/26/2002
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20020826
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC HARING aRDINANCE (QRAFT) 16 <br />~ry~ <br />d) The site plan shall indicate a location, for at least eae two equipment <br />buildings in addition to that proposed for use by the applicant. <br />e) <br />. An $-foot fence or wall shall be required around <br />the base of any tower. This fence or wall shall encompass all <br />accessory equipment within the compound. Fences shall be <br />required around guy wire tie downs as well. The fence or wall may <br />be placed around the perimeter of the property should the <br />applicantlownerwlsh to do so. <br />f} The telecommunications equipment planned for the proposed tower <br />cannot be accommodated on an existing tower due to one or more of the <br />following reasons: <br />1. The planned equipment would exceed the structural capacity of <br />existing and approved towers, considering existing and planned <br />use of those #owers and the towers cannot be reinforced to <br />accommodate planned or equivalent equipment at a reasonable <br />cost. <br />2. The planned equipment would cause radio frequency <br />interference with other existing or planned equipment for these <br />towers, and the interference cannot be prevented at a <br />reasonable cost. <br />3. Existing or approved towers do not have space on which the <br />equipment can be placed so it can function effectively and <br />reasonably in parity with similar existing or approved equipment. <br />4. No tower or other suitable facility exists in an area where the <br />equipment to be placed an the tower will function in its intended <br />manner. <br />g) The communications tower is structurally designed to support at least <br />efts two additional users, and the Special Use Permit includes a <br />statement that the owner of the tower is willing to permit other user(s) to <br />attach communication facilities which dv not interfere with the primary <br />purpose of the tower, provided that such other users agree to negotiate a <br />reasonable compensation to the owner from such liability as may result <br />ftom such attachment. <br />h) The color of the tower.is of light tone, except to the extent required by <br />law, so as to minimize its visual impact. <br />The towers will not be artificially lighted unless required by the FAA, FCC <br />or other federal or state agency. Where such agencies allow a choice <br />between painting the tower or installing strobe lighting, painting shah be <br />the preferred choice. <br />j) The tower and antenna will not result in a significant adverse impact on <br />the view of or from any historic site, scenic road, ar major view corridor, <br />G:~TKinglTower Ord21CeN Tower Ordinance RevB <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.