Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-26-2002 - Agenda
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2002
>
Agenda - 08-26-2002
>
Agenda - 08-26-2002 - Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 4:16:06 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:54:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/26/2002
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20020826
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ ~ ~ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE (DRAFT) <br />b} A statement shall be submitted, prepared by a professional <br />engineer certified in telecommunication facility design, <br />which through rational engineering analysis, certifies the <br />tower's compliance with applicable standards as set forth in <br />the State of North Carolina Building Code, and any <br />assaciiated regulations; and describes the tower's capacity, <br />including an example of the number and type of antennas it <br />can accommodate. <br />c} Applicants shall provide: <br />1) the existing cell sites (latitude, longitude, power levels} <br />to which this proposed site will be a handoff candidate, <br />2) an Radio Frequency plot indica#ing the coverage of <br />existing sites, and that of the proposed site, <br />3} the search area utilized in finding the proposed site, <br />4} antenna heights and power levels of proposed site, and <br />5} a written affidavit stating why "the proposed site is <br />necessary for their communications service" (e.g., for <br />coverage, capacity, hole-filling, etc.} and a statement <br />that there are no existing alternative sites within the <br />provided search area and there are na alternative <br />technologies-available which could provide the <br />proposed service enhancbrnent without the tower. <br />a) County staff will utilize the services of a registered <br />professional engineer to confirm the statement <br />made in item 5) above. No tower shall be permitted <br />to exceed its designed loading capacity. For all <br />towecs attached to existing structures, the statement <br />shall include certification that the structure can <br />support the Iaad superimposed from the tower. All <br />towers shall have the capaci#y to permit multiple <br />users; at a minimum monopole towers shall <br />accommodate two (2} users and self-suppartllattice <br />or guyed towers shall, at a minimum accommodate <br />three {3} users. <br />d} Standards of evaluation. <br />1} Tower height shall be measured from the base of the <br />tower to the highest point of the proposed <br />antenna(s) to be located atop the tower structure. <br />2} Telecommunication towers shall conform with all of <br />the requirements of Section $.8.17a.2 (Standards of <br />Evaluation} of the Zoning Qrdinance. <br />G:1TKing\Tower Ord21Cet1 Tower Ordinance RevB <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.