Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 8s
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2002
>
Agenda - 08-20-2002
>
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 8s
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2017 4:39:43 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:53:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/20/2002
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8s
Document Relationships
2002 S Planning - Chapel Hill Amendment to the Joint Planning Agreement to Provide a Linkage with the Water and Sewer Management, Planning and Boundary Agreement
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\General Contracts and Agreements\2000's\2002
Minutes - 20020820
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> long-term interest area. Craig Benedict said that we have looked at what areas and what watersheds <br /> can be most easily served by a utility authority. In this case, the area is presently served in part by <br /> OWASA. For fiscal efficiency, it was best that OWASA would be the best entity to continue services to <br /> this area. He will provide a copy of this agreement to Mr. Katz. <br /> Commissioner Gordon said that her recollection is the same in that the idea was to have the <br /> long-term service area be the nearest utility provider. <br /> Chair Jacobs said that since the County is not in the water business, the County yields to the <br /> water utilities. That is the simplest way. <br /> Commissioner Brown made reference to the urban services boundary and said that it has an <br /> aspect that the utilities were possibly in a position of creating the future for Chapel Hill, Carrboro, and <br /> Orange County by extending water and sewer. This water and sewer boundary agreement puts the, <br /> responsibility on the elected boards to create the future in terms of land planning, etc. <br /> Craig Benedict said that the JPA agreement is a land use document and a coordination <br /> document. He said that what we are suggesting is to link these two existing agreements and make both <br /> of them stronger. <br /> There was no one from the public who wished to speak to this item. <br /> Pat Evans said that in the last year our nation, our state, and everyone else have seen <br /> changes. She suggested that we might want to think about an additional issue, which would come as an <br /> exception to this agreement. She is very supportive of urban boundaries because she thinks it is a way <br /> of controlling sprawl. At the Chapel Hill Town Council's last meeting they adopted the SAPFO <br /> memorandum of understanding. She said that our school district is greater than our municipality districts. <br /> She said that if we were to make an exception only on the basis of schools and make it with some <br /> restrictions, she thinks it would have several benefits. The land outside of an urban boundary is valued <br /> for what it can be used for. If the school system could purchase land outside of an urban boundary, the <br /> land would be cheaper. She does not feel it will cause sprawl. She feels there are going to be additional <br /> problems with trying to locate schools and parks together. There is a site being considered for a school <br /> that is now inside of the urban boundary. However, if this amendment is adopted, it will be outside of the <br /> urban boundary. <br /> Chair Jacobs responded by saying that several work groups have been set up with the two <br /> school boards. He said that the County Commissioners have the same concerns that the land acreage <br /> that is recommended by the state promotes sprawl and it pushes the schools to the edges of the urban <br /> service area because the land is cheaper. There will be conversations in the worts groups about acreage <br /> requirements. He said that we could add to the discussion putting schools in the rural buffer. He pointed <br /> out that this is not the direction that the County Commissioners are going, but they are willing to discuss <br /> it. <br /> Joal Broun asked about the size of the high schools and if this was based on the number of <br /> students or the acreage. Chair Jacobs said that there would be a committee made up of the chairs and <br /> vice-chairs of the Board of County Commissioners and the two school boards. This committee is going <br /> to look at the assumptions about the projections, the type of facility (500, 700, 1500-student), and the <br /> acreage. <br /> Joal Broun asked at what time the public would be able to comment on the potential location, <br /> type, and size of high schools. Chair Jacobs said that a schedule would be developed to have the <br /> issues resolved by the end of this year. <br /> Commissioner Gordon said that she thought this high school group was going to try to make a <br /> recommendation before the end of June so that it could be included in the Capital Investment Plan (CIP). <br /> Chair Jacobs said that they will probably make a recommendation by the end of the year. He feels that <br /> there is a proposal that will be included in the CIP. <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Halkiotis , seconded by Commissioner Carey to refer <br /> this item to the Towns of Chapel Hill and Carrboro to refer this as appropriate under their land use <br /> regulations and to refer it to the Orange County Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to <br /> the Orange County Commissioners no sooner than June 4, 2002. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.